Search for: "Does 1-54"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 3,421
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2011, 10:18 am
To prove intent to sale, the prosecution does not need to prove that you sold anything, only that you intended to. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
Section 3(1) establishes a civil cause of action: “(1) An actual or apprehended breach of section 1(1) may be the subject of a claim in civil proceedings by the person who is or may be the victim of the course of conduct in question. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
The proposition that it would only be in very exceptional cases that an applicant would succeed in raising an arguable case which the Strasbourg Court adopted in [54] of its judgment appears to set a high standard, one that will be hard to achieve. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
The proposition that it would only be in very exceptional cases that an applicant would succeed in raising an arguable case which the Strasbourg Court adopted in [54] of its judgment appears to set a high standard, one that will be hard to achieve. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
The feature in question related to the portable handheld audio device of the system according to claim 1 as originally filed and further specified that it was adapted to transmit audio data from the portable handheld audio device to the external source. [4.2] In the board’s view, if a feature which has not been searched and which further defines an element which was already part of a claim which had been searched, is taken from the description and added to this claim in order to… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 1:38 pm
EPA requiring the issuance of final standards [See WIMS 1/21/11], U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 6:45 pm
Puche, 350 F.3d 1137, 1153-54 (11th Cir. 2003) (affirming that “facilitating property” is subject to forfeiture under § 982(a)(1) to the same extent as the assets being laundered). [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm
It does not follow that the advice has to be accepted or followed nor for that matter, for the advice to be correct. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 10:39 am
PS: I have several other keyword ad cases to blog, including 1-800 Contacts, Consumerinfo.com and Binder. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 5:53 am
Center 1700 November 22, 2010 The claim at issue read: 1. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:03 am
Effectively, spending public funds on more protracted and more numerous hearings, rather than experienced lawyers, does not amount to a saving to the public purse. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
”[1] A number of recent, post-Frye[2] Board decisions start with this statement, or a similar allocation of burden of proof. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 7:02 am
Bevacizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that does just that. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:46 am
[Id. at 53-54.] [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 5:52 pm
Robert and Susan McWilliam appealed to the Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal under Section 48(1) and 54(1) of the Drainage Act (The "Act") from the Engineer's Report (the "Report") dated July 22, 2010, and from a decision of the Court of Revision dated September 1, 2010. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 9:57 am
DOE, Department of Interior Announce Offshore Wind InitiativesDOE and the U.S. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 2:19 pm
§ 352(b)(1)(A)(iii); Judicial-Conduct Rule 11(c)(1)(D).Prof. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 9:20 am
Super. 1, 10 (App. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 10:44 am
The Strategic Work Plan will begin with two major initiatives: (1) $50.5 Million in funding for research and development; and (2) the continued identification of "Wind Energy Areas. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
Since D1 is prior art under A 54(3) it is permissible to restore novelty by using a disclaimer (see G 1/93 [2.1]). [read post]
