Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2017, 8:50 am
Under English law, Zambrano carers are not “habitually resident” in the UK and are thereby disqualified from receiving income-related benefits, including income support, income based jobseekers’ allowance, income-related employment and support allowance, state pension credit, housing benefit, council tax benefit, child benefit and child tax credit. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 7:03 am
The Supreme Court held that the Appeal Court had not applied the correct test from R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, which for threats from third parties is whether the state has failed to provide reasonable protection against harm inflicted by non-state agents. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 8:46 am
It would have been easy to state "BMW repair specialist", distinct from the word BMW (para 28). [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 12:52 am
The Court stated that although the Promise Doctrine is viewed as uniquely Canadian, it has its roots in English law in Hatmaker v Joseph ((1919) 36 PRC 231) and Re Alsop's Patent ((1907) 24 RPC 733 - "false suggestion or representation") where, the now extinct doctrine the Court referred to as the "False Promise Doctrine" derived. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 pm
Most notably, in Hoyt v. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 9:39 am
The Court stated that although the Promise Doctrine is viewed as uniquely Canadian, it has its roots in English law in Hatmaker v Joseph ((1919) 36 PRC 231) and Re Alsop's Patent ((1907) 24 RPC 733 - "false suggestion or representation") where, the now extinct doctrine the Court referred to as the "False Promise Doctrine" derived. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 9:14 am
Target Corporation The law surrounding premises liability cases in Massachusetts works quite a bit differently than it does in other states, which hold truer to the common law as handed down from the old English legal system. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 9:14 am
Target Corporation The law surrounding premises liability cases in Massachusetts works quite a bit differently than it does in other states, which hold truer to the common law as handed down from the old English legal system. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 3:22 am
In 1878, the Court ruled in Wilkerson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 10:01 am
“Are you asking this court, therefore, to give the mother’s vote in this family matter more weight? [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:26 am
This basis of jurisdiction had been recently applied by the English Court of Appeal in Cartier International AG & Ors v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd & Ors [2016] EWCA Civ 658 (06 July 2016) in affirming the jurisdiction of English courts to make blocking orders against Internet Service Providers requiring them to disable access to foreign websites that offered counterfeit goods for sale. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 2:58 pm
As Rosalind English writes in our initial summary here, the case is a rich tapestry of issues from devolved government to the power of the state versus women’s rights and essential healthcare. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:22 pm
United States, 480 U. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 10:36 am
V. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 8:29 am
This plaintiff has a trial-worthy case.The case is Dilfanian v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 9:30 pm
The high court’s decision in Barron v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm
The Irish State could be facing millions in claims for damages from citizens if public bodies illegally process their personal information. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 12:51 pm
Fernández Arroyo, The curious case of an arbitration with two annulment courts: comments on the YPF saga Rushmi Sethi, International Arbitration: The Secretary of State for the Home Department v Raytheon Systems Ltd, and enforcement of arbitration awards in England and Wales [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
It would overturn the Supreme Court’s decision in eBay v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am
[Correction: An earlier version of this post stated that Kennedy’s opinion in Murr v. [read post]
