Search for: "English v. State" Results 2681 - 2700 of 6,455
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm by Sean Burke
In Doctor’s Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:20 am by SHG
A sweet start to the statement of facts in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 6:37 am
Two recent English cases, Karen Millen v Karen Millen Fashions Ltd and Skyscape Cloud Services Ltd v Sky Plc, indirectly consider Declarations of Non-Infringement in relation to Trade Marks. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
Even Justice Scalia does this often, for instance in the Second Amendment case, Heller v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:29 am
The applicable law to govern Innovia's breach of confidence claim was the English law. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 5:14 am by Hayleigh Bosher
As such, PRS and QA both have a close and genuine link to their home state. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 5:08 am by Kevin
There is no “federal common law,” and adopting English common law would have been up to the individual states. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:45 pm
The court may declare ineligible to act as fiduciary a person unable to read and write the English language. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
  Following the publications complained of he felt compelled to, and did, make a formal announcement as to his true state of health both to the Board of the Company and to its workforce [43]. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal will consider whether the UK Government has recognised Interim President Guaidó as Head of State of Venezuela and, if so, whether any challenge to the validity of Mr Guaidó’s appointments to the Board of the Central Bank of Venezuela is justiciable in an English court. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:53 am by Dave
The application was refused on two grounds: first, "it is not, in the state of English law now, arguable that the unqualified right to possession by a landlord is incompatible with Article 8; or indeed, in the light of Sheffield CC v Smart [2002] HLR 34, with Article 1 Protocol 1 of the Convention" (at [8]); second, the claim was not arguable on the facts of the case in which it appeared to the local authority that the property was vacant, and so could not be… [read post]