Search for: "FISH v. STATE"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 3,432
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2010, 1:13 pm
My second reaction was sympathy for the Fish and Wildlife Service, which itself faces a complex and difficult job evaluating the effects of operation of the state and federal water projects on the smelt with limited information under intense political and time pressures. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:15 pm
On December 14th, in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
A fish tale: a small fish, the ESA, and our shared future. 40 Envtl. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:05 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Wild Fish Conservancy v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:51 am
After U.S. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:38 am
No more crush videos: President Barack Obama on Thursday signed into law a bill that outlaws the creation and distribution of so-called animal crush videos -- culminating a remarkably quick response to a Supreme Court decision handed down less than eight months ago.It was April 20 when the Court, in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 5:33 pm
WILD FISH CONSERVANCY v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:15 am
Pacific American Fish Co., Inc. 2010 Cal.App. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:57 am
In Aldana v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:32 am
The fish driving a car. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 9:12 pm
In the Pennsylvania case, McMillen v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:32 pm
I think it is Stanley Fish who offers the telling example: id I write an article called "what I think about Milton" and hurl it in through the transome, no one will read it. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 4:55 pm
" Exergen Corp. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:24 am
An excellent example of this trend can be found in the Wisconsin case of State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 6:59 am
During oral argument on Monday in Wall v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:05 pm
STRAHAN v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 5:47 pm
Reg. at 52,063 (stating that the “primary authors of this document are staff members of the Idaho Fish and Wildlife Office”). [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 12:42 pm
Information concerning the Claimant’s lost profits or earnings that were caused by the injury, destruction, or loss of specific property or natural resource as a result of the Spill (such as lost earnings by a fisherman whose fishing grounds have been closed or a hotel or rental property that has had decreased profits because beaches, swimming, or fishing areas have been affected by the oil from the Spill). [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 12:13 pm
One starts, of course, with the realisation that '[i]nterpretation, albeit a necessary tool to render the protection of Convention rights practical and effective, can only go so far' (Quark Fishing Ltd v United Kingdom (dec)). [read post]
