Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 15,515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2014, 8:09 am
Case citation: New York Pizzeria, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:30 am
Agency, LLC v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 5:22 pm
Griem v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 2:05 pm
Copeland v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 1:25 pm
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department: State Farm v. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 8:13 pm
In any case, Price v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:47 am
It’s also more useful than trying to figure out what -wrap this is/was. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 7:22 am
Budget Van Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:00 am
KG filed an application for registration of a Community trade mark, consisting in the figurative sign reproduced on the right, in relation to Classes 9, 35, 36 and 41 of the Nice Agreement. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 4:17 pm
" Kinney v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
Even though Holmes made many bad decisions (including Buck v. [read post]
9 May 2008, 1:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 8:21 am
Moreno v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:33 am
His Honour noted Kenny J had recognised in McCormick that it was often common to infer reputation from sales and advertising figures. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
The reference to Gitana v OHIMseems hardly relevant as the argument put to the Court by the applicant (Gitana) was that the mark it applied for had sufficient notoriety so as not to be confused with a similar earlier mark. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 9:16 am
If the case is pulled from the shelf, let's figure the following time is spent: 5 minutes to walk to the books, 2 minutes to pull the right volume, 5 more to copy the case and 5 more to walk back to the office for a grand total of 17 minutes. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 2:12 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Doe v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:54 am
Without this figure, the statistic was virtually useless: it cast no light on whether people who read the appellant’s material were likely to be terrorists, nor whether the material was likely to encourage the commission of terrorist acts [47]. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 9:50 am
Additional Resources: Bowers v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:27 am
By Eric Goldman Elsevier Ltd v. [read post]
