Search for: "Files v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" Results 2681 - 2700 of 3,770
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2010, 4:25 am
Becton, Dickinson and Co (case no. 2009-1008) (Patently-O) District Court N D Ohio: Amended pleading adding a new party relates back to the original filing date for purposes of first-to-file venue rule: Horton Archery LLC v American Hunting Innovations LLC et al (Docket Report) District Court M D Florida: ITC finding of noninfringement warrants summary judgement of noninfringement in parallel lawsuit: Solomon Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(IP Watch) Germany BGH rules on liability for links and adwords (IPKat) India Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008 now in force - ISP liability (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP) Israel Round table on software patents at the Israel Patent Office (The IP Factor) Invitation to submit briefs to IPO re software patent policy in Israel (The IP Factor) Central District Court rules that film download site be taken down and fines owner/operator: Organization for Protecting Cinematographical Creations (1993) &… [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(IP Watch)   Germany BGH rules on liability for links and adwords (IPKat)   India Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008 now in force – ISP liability (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP)   Israel Round table on software patents at the Israel Patent Office (The IP Factor) Invitation to submit briefs to IPO re software patent policy in Israel (The IP Factor) Central District Court rules that film download site be taken down and fines owner/operator: Organization for Protecting… [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(IP Watch)   Germany BGH rules on liability for links and adwords (IPKat)   India Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008 now in force – ISP liability (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP)   Israel Round table on software patents at the Israel Patent Office (The IP Factor) Invitation to submit briefs to IPO re software patent policy in Israel (The IP Factor) Central District Court rules that film download site be taken down and fines owner/operator: Organization for… [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 7:58 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
JUDICIAL AND RELATED EXPERIENCE: Appointed: United States Bankruptcy Judge, U.S. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 7:54 pm by Michael Shlansky
  TWI contends that they first became aware of the spill on December 15, 2009, when it received notice from the United States Coast Guard, naming TWI as the responsible party. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm by Jon L. Gelman
” Although the Sherman Anti-trust Act had been passed in 1890, the United States Supreme Court decision of U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 6:55 am by Tara Hofbauer
Circuit Court released a few notable opinions this week: on Monday, it announced its ruling in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
Also in June last year, the United Nations Human Rights Council unanimously approved a parallel project “[r]equest[ing] the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to continue the work on domestic law remedies to address corporate involvement in gross human rights abuses, and to organize consultations with experts, States and other relevant stakeholders”. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:37 am by Kevin LaCroix
Although I try to include on this blog topics involving issues from outside the United States, because of my background and experience, U.S-related topics tend to predominate. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 11:01 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:02 am by Chris Castle
Foreign data protection, privacy, and other laws and regulations can be more restrictive than those in the United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
  In America, for example, several claims have been brought under the Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA), which gives federal courts power to hear civil cases brought by foreign citizens for injuries caused by actions “in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 5:45 pm by Russell Knight
The Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution requires that everyone get proper notice of any court action. [read post]