Search for: "HALL v. STATE" Results 2681 - 2700 of 3,908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2016, 8:00 am by John Elwood
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:46 am by Frank Cranmer
: on two significant decisions on the legal recognition of same-sex couples: Buhuceanu and Others v Romania and Maymulakhin and Markiv v Ukraine. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 5:59 am
  Anti-Retaliation Under Federal and State Discrimination & Wage-Hour Laws; Implications of Burlington Northern v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 6:40 am by cdw
” As usually happens, this week’s edition includes substantial borrowings from Steve Hall’s Stand Down blog. [read post]
17 Apr 2022, 1:01 pm by Patricia Salkin
Available here: https://www.nycom.org/images/Open_Meetings_Law_2022_Amendments_-_New_Videoconference_Procedures.pdf OverviewAs part of the 2022 Enacted State Budget,1 the NY Legislature amended the NYS Open Meetings Law to provide when and how public bodies may conduct meetings via videoconference technology. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
After one year, sales in the state had dropped by 24 percent, but 90 percent of that decline in sales merely represented purchases shifting to neighboring states. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 8:54 am by John Elwood
Kentucky, 17-9467 Issues: (1) Whether the Kentucky Supreme Court violated the Eighth Amendment, as interpreted in Hall v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:50 am by Randall Hodgkinson
  Improper instructions (aiding and abetting)State v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 12:00 am
After the recent decision by the United States Supreme Court in Warger v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 12:15 pm by Ilya Somin
Jeff Benedict is a prominent reporter and author of Little Pink House, an excellent journalistic account of the events leading up to Kelo v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 5:10 am by Jeff Gamso
Presumably for these reasons, in the 13 years since we decided Penry v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 6:12 pm by Rory Little
In what reads like a brisk fifty-two-minute argument this morning, the Justices seemed inclined – but not certain – to accept, in Dietz v. [read post]