Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: A. C., A CHILD" Results 2681 - 2700 of 4,774
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2014, 10:30 am by Jack Goldsmith
  While it may not be in the self-interest of the Ukrainian mob to silence the Internet, nation states in conflict may make different choices. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 11:48 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
The Court has so far dealt, in particular, with the part of Brussels IIa dedicated to child matters, in case C in 2007, in Rinau in 2008, in A and Deticek in 2009 and in Povse, Purrucker I, McB,Purrucker II, Aguirre Zarraga and Mercredi in 2010. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:26 am by Karen T. Willitts, Esq.
Moreover, pursuant to the policy of this State to enforce court orders and judgments, as well as settlement agreements in matrimonial matters, ‘bad faith’ also has to include behavior designed to evade, without just cause, the lawful payment of alimony and/or child support. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
”Cases pertaining to family law, child custody, sexual assault — and anything that may include witness testimony — will not be conducted out of the broadcast room. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 5:00 am by K.O. Herston
Second, the petitioner must prove that terminating parental rights is in the child’s best interest, considering, among other things, the factors listed in Tennessee Code Annotated § 36-1-113(I). [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:45 am by James Edward Maule
That’s found in section 152(a) before the amendment, and in section 152(d)(1)(C) of the current statute. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:38 am
In other words, a home owned in a tenancy by the entirety by two elderly spouses gets up to $1 million of equity in protection for a declared homestead ($500,000 x 2), because each person can claim up to $500,000.00 in their separate property interest, and "stack" the homesteads to claim an aggregate exemption of $1 million together (M.G.L.. c. 188, §§1 & 2). [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
That’s found in section 152(a) before the amendment, and in section 152(d)(1)(C) of the current statute. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 6:35 pm
TECHNOLOGY, STALKING, AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: A GROWING JUDICIAL AND LEGISLATIVE RECOGNITION OF "ABUSE" By Michael C. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 1:22 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
While the Agencies gather further information and analyze the potential challenges expatriate plans may face in complying with the Affordable Care Act, the Expat FAQ states that for plan years beginning on or before December 31, 2015, the Agencies will treat expatriate health plans as treating the requirements of subtitles A and C of Title I of the Affordable Care Act if the plan and issuer comply with the pre-Affordable Care Act version of Title XXVII of the PHS Act, section 715 of ERISA,… [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:26 am by Steven Ballard
The husband argued that he should pay less in child support because the parties' middle child, who had lived with the wife at the time of the judgment, was now residing with him.After the effective date of the reform act, the judge issued a modified judgment. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 11:30 am by Jon Sands
  The 9th held that the substantial federal interest requirement is only required under the (c) subsection of 5032, where there is joint jurisdiction. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In spite of numerous attempts by his counsel to focus him on the "best interests" of C, A barely acknowledged the child's interests as separate from his own and never addressed them. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 7:33 am by Kysa Crusco
” The Supreme Court notes that the statute does not define, nor has the Court addressed, what it means to be “financially able” to provide a child with necessary subsistence, education or other care as RSA 170-C:5,II. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 5:05 am by K.O. Herston
Similarly, before the court may inquire as to whether termination of parental rights is in the best interests of the child, the court must first determine that the grounds for termination have been established by clear and convincing evidence. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:29 am
Such a warrant might say, “Go get the seized computer and search it for images of child pornography. [read post]