Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 2681 - 2700 of 18,400
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2020, 5:23 pm
  As Justice Bedsworth says, yes, offering him five years if he pleads guilty does make sure he goes to prison, and saves us a little bit of money in prosecution costs, but "[a]ny expense saved the state by his plea would likely be re-incurred with interest if he gets out in five years and there are still bus stops. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:08 pm
Bacon famously says:"You're investing in steam control. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:12 am by Amy Howe
At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re looks at the Court’s “unusual pro-criminal defendant summary reversal in the Double Jeopardy case” Martinez v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 2:12 am by Gilles Cuniberti
By doing so, the Court followed its own 2002 precedent in In re Arbitration between Monegasque de reassurances S.A.M. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 12:00 am by Rumpole
Re-read the portion we highlighted in red. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:18 am by sally
Supreme Court NML Capital Ltd v Argentina [2011] UKSC 31 (6 July 2011) McDonald, R (on the application of) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2011] UKSC 33 (6 July 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Dalton v Nottinghamshire County Council [2011] EWCA Civ 776 (06 July 2011) AH v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 787 (06 July 2011) Howell & Ors v Lees- Millais & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 786 (06 July 2011) Garnat… [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 3:54 pm by Tobias Thienel
Oellers-Frahm (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
Justice Savage (2019 BCCA 39, 373 C.C.C. (3d) 464). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:10 am
Candidate ineligible for appointment from the expired listHancock v The City of New York, 272 AD2d 80New York State Supreme Court Justice Ira Gammerman issued an order directing the New York City Department of Correctional Services to complete [Louis Hancock’s] hiring process and to pay him back pay from July 6, 1989, the date on which the department decided not to appoint Hancock, reduced by actual earnings from other employment.There were a number of problems with Judge… [read post]