Search for: "JOHN DOE, 2" Results 2681 - 2700 of 13,841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2009, 12:37 pm
 As result, the FAA states that it does not believe that it will have an "effective final rule" by the time the January, 2008, Order expires. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 3:00 am by Charles Cicero
One of the laws recently passed by the Louisiana Legislature and signed into law by Governor John Bell Edwards is Senate Bill 106, which went into effect on August 1, 2023. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 1:12 pm by Buce
He does it elsewhere, I suppose, depending on your definition. [read post]
22 May 2019, 3:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
I would like to thank John for allowing me to publish his article. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 1:30 pm by Robert Tanha
F.3, excludes gifts received during the marriage from a spouse’s net family property:4(2) The value of the following property that a spouse owns on the valuation date does not form part of the spouse’s net family property:1. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:41 pm
  When John Doe meets with an asset protection attorney, does XYZ's loan have to be considered in a personal solvency analysis for John? [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 9:02 pm
But time and again, the President has opted to go the route urged by the Vice President instead.I know John slightly. [read post]
Multiple justices asserted that prior case law does not demand that plaintiffs demonstrate discriminatory intent in proving that maps violated the VRA. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 2:24 am
Accordingly, the Board found the thirteenth du Pont factor to be neutral.Conclusion: Finding that the weakness of the registered mark did not outweigh the other relevant du Pont factors, the Board affirmed this Section 2(d) refusal to register.Read comments and post your comment here.KKM comment: Looks like the Board wasn’t willing to throw Applicant a bone in this case.Text Copyright Kira-Khanh McCarthy and John L. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
[Starbucks' Section 2(f) claim based on five years of continuous and substantially exclusive use was not challenged].Green Circle Alone: Starbucks also sought registration of this mark under Section 2(f) (thereby conceding that the mark is not inherently distinctive), but this time the USPTO challenged that claim. [read post]