Search for: "Jacob Rule" Results 2681 - 2700 of 3,167
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm by JD Hull
Sticking with them for our firm has been a good rule. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 10:03 am by Dov Jacobs
By Dov Jacobs On the 31 March, Pre-Trial Chamber II issued its Decision Pursuant to Article 15 of the Rome Statute on the Authorization of an Investigation into the Situation in the Republic of Kenya. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:01 am by Ashby Jones
The ruling could affect another lawsuit SCO filed against IBM. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:14 pm by The LBN Team
"In the government there are strict rules about speaking to the press and you aren't going to get many opportunities to convey your message," said Wong. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:35 pm
To recap, this conference is an opportunity to hear advice from some high-profile speakers, including Lord Justice Jacob and Anthony Robb-John (easyGroup IP Licensing). [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 3:03 pm by Michelle Wilde Anderson
As a matter of planning theory, Garnett’s setting is whether the rising tide of planning a la Jane Jacobs undermines policing policies that pursue the Broken Windows thesis. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 10:56 pm
This conference is your opportunity to hear advice from some high-profile speakers, including Lord Justice Jacob and Anthony Robb-John (easyGroup IP Licensing): click here for full programme details. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 5:28 pm by Michael A. DeMayo
If doctors, insurers, employers, and employees cannot count on the system to be fairly run, they may choose to go around it or choose to ignore other pertinent and important rules of protocol. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:47 am by Eugene Volokh
Thereafter, and without disclosing his corrupt relationship with the attorneys of Amato & Creely PLC or his receipt from them of cash and other things of value, Judge Porteous ruled in favor of their client, Liljeberg. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:56 am
The High Court ruled, in Clinton David Jacobs v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2010] EWHC 231 (QB), that under European Union Regulation 864/2007 (Rome II), Spanish law applied in the case of a UK resident seeking compensation for serious injuries sustained in Spain, at the hands of an uninsured driver, then resident in Spain.The claimant issued proceedings against the defendant, the Motor Insurers' Bureau, in its capacity as a compensatory body under the Motor Vehicles… [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:56 am
The High Court ruled, in Clinton David Jacobs v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2010] EWHC 231 (QB), that under European Union Regulation 864/2007 (Rome II), Spanish law applied in the case of a UK resident seeking compensation for serious injuries sustained in Spain, at the hands of an uninsured driver, then resident in Spain.The claimant issued proceedings against the defendant, the Motor Insurers' Bureau, in its capacity as a compensatory body under the Motor Vehicles… [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:02 pm by Anna Christensen
  And although Justice Scalia acknowledged that the rule suggested by Ms. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:52 pm by Randy Barnett
How then does Hamburger treat Senator Jacob Howard’s widely reported speech to the Senate on May 23, 1866, in which he says: “To these privileges and immunities [in Article IV Privileges and Immunities Clause which Corfield v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 5:59 am by Joshua Kubicki
Though much does indeed occur here, those of us that participate in the global arena understand there are greater interests and conflicting rules that can greatly impact one’s ability to respond to discovery. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:00 pm by Anna Christensen
  Moreover, there is no “grievous ambiguity” that would justify invoking the rule of lenity. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 5:05 am
Merpel says, not so long ago the learned judge was ruling on Spam; now he has graduated to pigs ...This little piggy went to market hereThree little piggies hereThree little wolves and the big bad pig here [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:51 pm by SOIssues
In the lawsuit, _____'s attorney, Jacob Deaton, said "Mr. _____ now seeks to recover damages, in the amount of $5,000,000, that he suffered by the unconstitutional designation. [read post]