Search for: "John Doe, in possession" Results 2681 - 2700 of 2,963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2009, 12:20 am
While there is a laundry list of attributes that any effective in-house lawyer will possess, the game changes dramatically when major litigation, government investigations and shareholder disputes loom simultaneously. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:11 pm
But our legal system does have mechanisms to make justice prevail and catch the unsavory. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:08 am
Does the President want to actually repeal those tax cuts this calendar year? [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 4:27 pm
  He must have had some of the   John Gotti Teflon going during his trial. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:05 pm
Speaking of venting prosecutors, what do you think is Williamson County District Attorney John Bradley's biggest beef with a proposal by Houston judges to reduce drug possession penalties from a felony to a misdemeanor? [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 12:23 pm
Matthewman does not get the honor of the first not guilty in the southern district for 2009. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 12:34 pm
” Example: “John Doe (hereinafter, ‘Doe’) …” I think anyone who cares enough to read what you wrote is smart enough to figure out “Doe” is John Doe. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Even if the lawyer is aware of the constitutional and international law that supports the sole authority of the ancestral law, the lawyer will feel bound to say the law does not matter given the legal system’s prior suppression of its existence. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 6:04 am
What the public generally does not realize is that these acts were not committed in isolation, one from the other. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 8:00 pm
(Today we call that Jury Nullification See the John Peter Zanger verdict) Many so called conservative (but I note not libertarian) bloggers were unhappy with the decision. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 3:57 pm
” (citing John Riley, Bush Won’t Revoke Pardon of Financier, Newsday, at A14 (Jan. 30, 2001)). [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 5:15 am
IRC 130(c)(2)(D) Don't you think it is essential to tort victims, trial lawyers and judges to be able to TRUST that those upon whom they rely for financial advice possess the ability to properly articulate the subject matter of their expertise? [read post]