Search for: "Johnson v. Case" Results 2681 - 2700 of 7,874
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm by Donald Thompson
 Not until counsel has been “repeatedly unconscious through not insubstantial portions” of even capital murder trials will prejudice to the defendant will be presumed (see, Muniz v Smith, 647 F3d 619 [6th Cir 2011]; Burdine v Johnson, 262 F3d 336, 340-41 [5th Cir 2001]; Tippins v Walker, 77 F3d 682, 685 [2nd Cir 1996]). [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 7:24 am
The court of appeals reasoned that, just as the city could not punish someone for their status – being homeless – it also could not punish them for conduct 'that is an unavoidable consequence of being homeless.'"Writes Amy Howe, at SCOTUSblog.Here's the 9th Circuit opinion: Johnson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  Indeed, its existence was recognised by the Court in a case not a million miles away factually from the Duchess of Sussex’s case. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:37 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At this blog, Rory Little covers Monday’s oral argument in Johnson v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:29 am by Matt Sundquist
”  In the McDonald case, Johnson contends, the digital archives support Chicago’s arguments in favor of the handgun ban. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 10:24 am
This shift in argument form is exemplified, as this article discusses, in the contrast between the Fourth Amendment reasoning found in the 1948 case Johnson v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 10:28 am
Anton (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 87 (employee claiming gender discrimination can submit evidence that decision maker harassed and made sexist comments towards other female employees, Johnson v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which it will consider whether last Term’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 4:06 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Monday’s decision in Spokeo v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:01 am by William Ford
After losing on jurisdictional grounds, Republicans sought to salvage their case, known as McCarthy v. [read post]