Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 2681 - 2700 of 21,107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2006, 4:21 am
Plaintiff claimed defendants were aware of the malfunctioning lock but failed to repair it.Defendants denied they were responsible for the attack and contended they had no knowledge of the defective lock. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:06 am by Daniel E. Cummins
However, the Defendants did not tender payment of the settlement because they asserted that a Medicare lien existed that had to be satisfied prior to payment as the Defendants could potentially be liable for the lien. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 11:05 am by Kirk Jenkins
” The clinic’s website stated that all clinic doctors had faculty status at the defendant hospital’s school of medicine. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:11 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
   The Plaintiff filed a Complaint alleging that the Defendant was liable because it breached its duty to her in failing to keep the rear area of her leased lot free and clear of all dangerous conditions. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 11:22 am by Anthony Zaller
      California’s joint employer test “[T]he basis of liability is the defendants knowledge of an failure to prevent the work form occurring. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:31 pm
The Appellant Division held that under the requisite provision Vehicle and Traffic Law there was a presumption that the operator of the vehicle operated with the owner’s permission whether express or implied which made every owner liable for injuries resulting from negligent use or operation a vehicle. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 12:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
" That's why, for instance, most courts have adopted various so-called "no-duty" or "limited-duty" rules, such as the rule in most states that a social host who serves alcohol to guests can't be liable to third parties who are injured when the guests drive drunk. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 1:07 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
This means that the defendant will be liable for the full extent of a plaintiff’s injuries, even if their injuries were more than an average person would experience under similar circumstances. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 12:23 pm by Cardoso Law, PLLC
Demonstrating Liability for the Harmful Acts of a Third Party The court explained that whether the defendant was deemed negligent and therefore liable for the plaintiff’s harm hinged on whether it had notice that the man presented a risk of harm. [read post]
23 May 2010, 11:53 am
The employer's own agents and employees are not liable under Reynolds v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 2:44 pm by Arfaa Law Group
As part of the examination, the defendant touched the plaintiff’s breasts and performed invasive digital pelvic and rectal examinations. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:03 am by Gertler Law Firm
  So, for example, if a jury determines that an injured person has suffered a total of $100,000 in damages and that one defendant was 10% liable while the other was 90% liable, the first defendant would be responsible for paying $10,000 of the damages while the second would be responsible for paying $90,000. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 7:56 am by Ken Davidson
On this day in 1988, a California court held that CBS Records and Ozzy Osbourne were not liable for the suicide of a teenager who killed himself while listening to Osbourne’s music. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
.), the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court granted a Defendant County's Motion for Summary Judgment in a slip and fall case. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 7:17 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
When an alleged harasser is a coworker of the complainant, or is otherwise not part of the company’s management, the employer is only liable if it was aware of the alleged harassment and failed to make reasonable efforts to remedy the situation. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 10:12 am by The Ansara Law Firm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, justices ruled in favor of defendant, based on the open and obvious doctrine defense. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:58 pm by Ralph L. Jacobson
Therefore, the potential deponent husband is also potentially liable for all sums recoverable against the defendant wife. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 9:15 am by Callan Stein
Indeed, the DTSA’s immunity provision dictates that a whistleblower may not be held criminally or civilly liable for disclosing a trade secret, provided that the disclosure satisfies certain requirements. 18 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:28 pm
For a defendant to be found criminally liable, he must simply be aware that the conduct may likely result in harm to a child. [read post]