Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 4,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
Kerr stated in her factum, the “approach enunciated in Pettkus v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 9:04 pm
If the answer was yes, then the second issue was whether Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No.3) [2009] UKHL 28 applies in this context so as to require the Home Office to provide a gist of the closed material upon which it seeks to rely to the employee and his legal representatives. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am
” 18 months later Lord Phillips, giving the judgment of the whole Court of Appeal in Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd, said the opposite: “Thus copyright is antithetical to freedom of expression. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 11:00 pm
Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
Can you describe the differences between statutory law systems in the United States and the statutory codes of European states? [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:16 am
JD (Congo) and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Public Law Project [2012] EWCA Civ 327. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 11:53 am
Lack of assessment of features 'commonplace' in current papercut works DJ Clarke outlined the correct approach to be used in comparing artistic works, as that of Lord Hoffman in Designers Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textile) Ltd. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 1:17 am
', Lars Brahms looks at the recent England and Wales High Court decision of Vestel Elektronik Sanayi v HEVC Advance LLC, which raised this question as well as the questions of what the proper basis would be for such a claim, and where this claim might be brought.Trade MarksGuestKat Nedim Malovic examines an intriguing decision from the General Court, which stated that the relevant public's attention is 'average at best' when assessing likelihood of… [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 6:54 am
" (Bonz Group (Pty) Ltd v Cooke [1994] 3 N.Z.L.R. 216). [read post]
14 May 2021, 6:53 am
Next Row Ltd [2014] EWHC 2084 (IPEC) HHJ Hacon at 31 and Livingstone v Rawyards Coal Co. (1880) 5 App.Cas., 25, Lord Blackburn at 39.] [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
” A Lord Chamberlain for the internet? [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 11:39 am
The first was the United States, which is composed of states united into one mass or body, although all agree that entry into the union does not deprive a state of its distinct and individual existence. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 2:12 pm
This was with reference to the judgment of HHJ Luba QC in Pavey v LB Hackney. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:45 am
Lord Justice Laws in the High Court has now rubbished that suggestion, saying: Lord Carey’s observations are misplaced. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 1:57 pm
German princes wrote to King George V, offering to substitute themselves for the kaiser. [read post]
11 Nov 2023, 1:24 am
The court agreed with the corporate defendants, having applied the two-stage test set out by the House of Lords in Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 12:17 pm
" State v. [read post]
Golden Anniversary: The Supreme Court’s Engel Decision Protected Religious Liberty In Public Schools
22 Jun 2012, 8:06 am
Supreme Court handed down a crucial church-state ruling in Engel v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 3:16 pm
Part V concludes with reflections on the exemplary significance of the natural born citizen clause for constitutional theory.I highly recommend Sach's paper--which is very fine indeed. [read post]
