Search for: "MARK LONG"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 31,390
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2012, 3:02 pm
Hi my name is T. and a long time ago in august of 1998 i use to be on heroin and crack i never rob anyone to take care of my habits I always kept a job up until than, or I had a hustle at the time of my addiction I started selling crack so on august 28, 1998 I was waiting for my package and being that I was inpatient I could not wait any longer I went to pick up my package, upon picking it up that’s where the drugs was sold so instead of me getting my package and go I sold the last… [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:09 pm
This Sunday marks the beginning of Daylight Saving Time. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 4:37 am
The NFL is opposing (on 2(a), 2(d), and dilution grounds) the mark shown below left, for motorcycle fender side cover panels, based upon the League's ownership of the mark shown on the right, for football services, clothing, and various other goods. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 11:01 am
In the context of applicant's goods, consumers will ascribe the geographic meaning to the mark rather than, as applicant suggests,associate the mark with the title of a Spanish language folk song. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:19 am
Please mark that on your calendars. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 12:20 pm
Graeme Dinwoodie and Mark Janis have picked apart the statutory and historical support for such a requirement, but these days I'm leaning mostly towards Mark McKenna's primary argument (also made by Dinwoodie & Janis): as long as anything can serve a source-identifying function (remember Breyer's rejection of ontology in Qualitex), trademark use isn't a helpful limit.Here's an interesting set of examples. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:00 am
Flick When CBS and Time Warner announced Monday they had ended their month-long standoff over retransmission of CBS programming on Time Warner cable systems, the announcement brought a sigh of relief from Time Warner subscribers, particularly the NFL fans among them, and the usual press statements putting each party's best spin on the highly confidential result. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 10:50 am
If your mark includes a design element, you will need a high quality reproduction of the mark. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 3:47 am
"[A]s long as the mark was used on some of the identified goods or services as of the filing of the application, the application is not void in its entirety. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 3:08 am
Co.: to establish that a proposed mark falsely suggests a connection with a person or institution, it must be shown that: (1) The mark is the same as, or a close approximation of, the name or identity previously used by another person or institution; (2) The mark would be recognized as such, in that it points uniquely and unmistakably to that person or institution; (3) The person or institution named by the mark is not connected with the activities… [read post]
18 May 2017, 1:07 am
As long as the important parts of the sign registered for are the ones that create the technical feature, the mark should not be registered. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 8:27 am
Marks is over 34 miles away. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 2:30 am
Richard & Son Long Island Corporation v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 3:59 am
This Kat hopes it goes well; he has fond memories of the Institute's eponymous founder Tom McCarthy, with whom he once had a long and highly educational lunch when Tom came visiting in London.Fancy some Fudg (sic)? [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 3:15 am
"Judge Bergsman opined that, based on QVC's long and successful use of the mark, consumers are likely to regard DENIM & CO. as "identifying all clothing Applicant sells and not [likely to] believe the mark refers only to clothing made of denim. [read post]
23 May 2016, 6:28 am
SU instructors also may accurately identify themselves as being CISSP-certified, so long as they follow ISC2’s regulations governing the use of the mark. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 8:36 pm
How long do patent applications maintain patent-pendency on average? [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 4:15 pm
Axon’s complaint marks the latest salvo in a decades-long critique of the disparity between FTC and Department of Justice merger enforcement procedures. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 3:46 am
Here’s the rest of what I read this week: Social Media & Workplace Technology NLRB is Back and Ready for Action (Part I) – from Daniel Schwartz’s Connecticut Employment Law Blog Blog Wars: Employer Controls and Employee Rights Regarding Personal Blogging – from The L•E•Jer NLRB Takes Issue With Employer’s Response to Employee’s Tweet – from Molly DiBianca’s Delaware Employment Law Blog An Appeal for Cooler Heads on NLRB’s Social… [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 9:00 pm
I’d been kissed and hugged and we were all making lots of “long time no see” sorts of comments. [read post]
