Search for: "MATTER OF C A" Results 2681 - 2700 of 36,760
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Brooke MacKenzie
Even if the matter dies in the investigation stage or ends with a dismissal of the disciplinary allegations made, this would occur only after the lawyer has endured significant stress and expended substantial time and possibly money (to retain counsel) to defend themselves. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm by Ezra Rosser
The same is true in matters of inheritance and succession in family-owned businesses. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:48 am by Guest Author
Another was the Federal Trade Commission’s “Trade Practice Submittals,” as recounted in Gerald C. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
While prosecutors would likely prefer that he avoid public interviews, Cohen has been maximizing his exposure on the legal matter — a signature throughout his career. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 3:02 am by INFORRM
Dropping the C-bomb Obvious allusions to strong expletives (and their derivatives) can prove problematic. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
To be sure, it can be argued that New York is merely adding to the penalty for falsifying the records of a New York business enterprise when the conduct appears more egregious, and thus it should not matter under whose law the concealed crime arises. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 4:16 pm by Larry
Friedman Contact: customslawblog@gmail.com Twitter: @customslawblog (c) 2020 All Rights Reserved. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 11:44 am by Tobin Admin
This Agreement . . . is intended to constitute a qualified assignment within the meaning of Section 130 (c) of the Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 9:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
§ 1125(c)(3)(C).PANELISTS Bennett Evan CooperDickinson Wright PLLCCounsel For RespondentProf. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 9:07 am by Anton Gerber
[8] Opinion of Advocate-General Jacobs of January, 28th 1999, Case C-67/96 – Albany International v Stichting Bedrijfspensioenfonds, EU:C:1999:28, paras 209-217 [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 7:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
[For affirmative misrepresentations this wouldn’t matter, but for omissions state of mind does matter.] (2) Did defendants suppress research into variability of response for financial reasons? [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 5:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On a motion brought under CPLR §3211 (a)(l) dismissal is warranted when documentary evidence submitted conclusively establishes a defense to the asserted claims as a matter of law. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 7:13 pm by Daniel Schwartz
It should also be vetted through the Labor & Public Employee Committee which normally (though not always) has primary jurisdiction over these types of workplace matters. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Lawrence Solum
No matter how complicated the rules, situations would inevitably arise that were not covered or in which the rules produced a perverse and unintended result. [read post]