Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 2681 - 2700 of 42,196
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2023, 11:28 am by Whitney Hodges and Barbara Machado*
” Court Finds Literal Arguments “Miss the Point” In affirming the trial court’s ruling, the Court of Appeal found – under the substantial evidence standard of review – that these arguments “miss[ed] the point” for a myriad of reasons. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:00 am by Robert May
Personal injury law involves intricate legal procedures, rules of evidence, and negotiation skills that experienced lawyers possess. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:05 am
But in view of the Constitution, in the eye of the law, there is in this country no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 4:50 am by Y. Michael Yin, JD
  (b) Issue: Did the trial court err in ruling on matters not admitted into evidence? [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Robyn Powell
Ultimately, they settled the matter, with the school district agreeing to enroll Miguel at the Michigan School for the Deaf and provide ASL instruction to the family. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:45 pm by Steve Bainbridge
The court will defer to the board's decision under the business judgment rule, absent evidence that a majority of the board (not an individual director) acted out of a conflict of interest. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 3:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Justice Trower said that while the claimant’s views were genuinely held, they did constitute reliable expert evidence. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Laura Dooley
Determining whether a material fact is the subject of a dispute that is “genuine,” the Court has said, parallels the Rule 50 standard for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
We then argue for greater engagement in real world legal ethics, no matter how controversial. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am by Dan Lopez
It doesn’t matter because, under the rule of reason, the court made enough findings to demonstrate that Apple conduct was not anti-competitive. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:54 am by doug
The issue concerning the wife’s credit card payments ended up being a matter of proof, rather than an absolute no-no. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
  In its decision, the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled that a Plaintiff’s choice of forum is entitled to great weight. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm by Barry Winograd
For the dissent, the decision “invents” a new rule for the FAA. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”Previewing the attitude that would be on display in the Clark case, Doug Evans called the Flowers case “a ridiculous ruling. [read post]