Search for: "Miller, Appeal of"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 4,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2015, 11:43 am
The client appealed the decision and the SJC took direct review of the case. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 4:24 am
It is unclear whether the firm will appeal the verdict and judgment. [read post]
3 May 2010, 7:01 am
Some insurance companies have even given us naming rights, calling certain motions "Miller & Zois" motions because they are widely taken from our site and filed in other cases. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 11:43 am
The client appealed the decision and the SJC took direct review of the case. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:59 am
-Colin Miller [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:19 am
The case is on appeal. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:11 pm
Dowd from West here Find Ray Dowd at Dunnington Bartholow & Miller LLP tweetmeme_source = 'raydowd'; Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 5th Ed. 2010) by Raymond J. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:14 am
In Miller v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 4:20 am
Miller, the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, determined there was no ineffective assistance in failing to advise a client about sex offender registration requirements during a guilty plea. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 12:12 am
Being different has always had an appeal for me, since we spend too much time in our lives trying to please other people. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 11:25 am
And today, like NOW: Appellate specialist Rick Derevan of Snell & Wilmer with speak to the OCBA Appellate Law Section about preserving and exploiting the record in business appeals. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm
Miller, Smith and Greenwood were all decided under the Fourth Amendment, which applies to state and federal law enforcement throughout the United States. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:24 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:33 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 8:42 am
The Court of Appeal’s Opinion CEQA’s Project Description Requirements The Court of Appeal prefaced its discussion with a statutory overview of relevant legal principles, focusing heavily on CEQA’s rules and requirements governing an EIR’s project description, including: The EIR’s project description must contain: (1) the project’s precise location and boundaries; (2) a statement of the project’s objectives and underlying… [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 10:09 am
In a lengthy published decision filed September 9, 2014, the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part the trial court’s judgment denying a writ petition challenging Colusa County’s adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 1:15 pm
The Court Of Appeal Reverses The Judgment And Upholds The Addendum And Revised Project Against All Challenges In reviewing the City’s actions without deference to the trial court’s decision, the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment and held that (1) City’s reliance on the Addendum did not violate CEQA, and (2) City did not impermissibly “spot zone. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 2:47 pm
The petitioner has the burden to prove it exhausted and whether exhaustion occurred is usually deemed a question of law reviewed de novo on appeal. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 9:32 am
Miller Mfg. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 1:00 am
Times Newspaper Ltd v Flood; Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd; Frost & Ors v MGN Ltd, heard 24-26 January 2017. [read post]
