Search for: "New v. State"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 107,443
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2007, 2:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 3:38 am
He stated that though the Secretary of State failed to show how the Regulations comply with art 3(1), it is in the political, rather than the legal, arena that the consequences should be played out. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:17 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 2:44 pm
New York State Urban Development Corp. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 9:29 am
Owen obtained his client’s release, a new trial, and the subsequent dismissal of all charges. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 8:24 am
Florida's Second District Court of Appeal recently found in Romanyuk v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 8:50 am
This might seem a common-sense conclusion, but it was one recently decided by the Florida Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 1:52 pm
The case is Bell v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:26 pm
SOURCE: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 11:37 am
According to a news release by the U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 1:28 pm
In Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:22 am
The Court's holding in Apprendi led to its holding that the United States Sentencing Guidelines were advisory, rather than mandatory, five years later, in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 2:11 am
Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent) v James (FC) (Appellant) (formerly Walker and another) R (on the application of Lee) (FC) (Appellant) Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent) v James (FC) (Appellant) (formerly Walker and another); R (on the application of Lee) (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent) and one other action Secretary [...] [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 12:35 pm
By Lisa Armstrong *** In October, 2014, Prisoners’ Legal Services of New York reached a settlement with the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (doccs) in Cookehorne v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 9:30 am
The brief and a summary of its argument are available here: In 2010, the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
Removing a tenured State or municipal employee claimed to have abandonment the position from service
10 Feb 2023, 9:50 am
New York State Civil Service Rule 4 NYCRR 5.3(d), since repealed, permitted the appointing authority of a State department or agency employee to terminate a tenured employee in the Classified Service absent for a period of ten or more days without an explanation by deeming the employee to have resigned from his or her position. [read post]
Removing a tenured State or municipal employee claimed to have abandonment the position from service
10 Feb 2023, 9:50 am
New York State Civil Service Rule 4 NYCRR 5.3(d), since repealed, permitted the appointing authority of a State department or agency employee to terminate a tenured employee in the Classified Service absent for a period of ten or more days without an explanation by deeming the employee to have resigned from his or her position. [read post]
31 May 2013, 3:33 pm
(unrecognized tribe, bankruptcy)* State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmCases featured:State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 3:51 pm
In that solo opinion, Thomas argued that the Court should abandon New York Times v. [read post]
