Search for: "People v. House" Results 2681 - 2700 of 11,351
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2007, 10:33 pm
Libby went to prison, he might further implicate other people in the White House, and that there was some kind of relationship here that does not exist in any of President Clinton's pardons, nor, according to those that we've talked to ... is that it's never existed before, ever," Conyers said in a broadcast interview Sunday. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 11:34 pm by Ezra Rosser
In the second half of the Essay, I discuss the recent Ninth Circuit case, Boise v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  That argument isn’t at issue in the case:  Everyone agrees that if Donald Trump was subject to Section 3 as President, and if he engaged in an insurrection on January 6, 2021, then that conduct rendered him legally ineligible to serve as President or in the other covered state and federal offices (absent action by two-thirds of both houses of Congress to eliminate that disability). [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 2:56 pm
Initially the Claimant’s full rent was paid by housing benefit. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:57 am by The Berniard Law Firm
Furthermore, Louisiana in 2008 had the 11th highest drunken driving fatalities in the nation, with over 912 people killed due to drinking and driving. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:57 am
Furthermore, Louisiana in 2008 had the 11th highest drunken driving fatalities in the nation, with over 912 people killed due to drinking and driving. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 8:06 am
Jeffers, 342 U.S. 48, 51 (1951): The Fourth Amendment prohibits both unreasonable searches and unreasonable seizures, and its protection extends to both "houses" and "effects. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:42 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The practice did not put a disabled person at a disadvantage in comparison with non-disabled people for the simple reason that the practice only applies to disabled people. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:39 am
The Supreme Court Thursday is expected to issue arguably the most anticipated decision since 2000's Bush v. [read post]