Search for: "People v. House"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 12,999
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2014, 5:16 am
” At Cato at Liberty, Ilya Shapiro and Gabriel Latner discuss the amicus brief that Cato filed in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:09 am
Lord Reed adds a further category of persons to whom a “less stringent approach” to precariousness might be appropriate: people who “might be under a reasonable misapprehension as to their ability to maintain a family life in the UK”. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 12:17 am
Similarly, in R v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 1:46 pm
The case of Nzolameso v Westminster has made it too difficult. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:00 pm
Just as we’ve seen “deserving” cases fall through the cracks of the bedroom tax exemptions, no doubt we will see the same happen to young people trying to find somewhere to live. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:22 am
(a) The Fourth Amendment protects the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 7:00 am
In the closing days of the recently concluded May term, the Illinois Supreme Court handed down its decision in Marks v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
Journalism and the PCC There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but four “resolved” complaints: Information Affairs Authority of Bahrain v The Independent, Clause 1, 14 December 2011 ; Mrs Kate Adams-Moor v The People, Clause 1, 13/12/2011; Brent Council v Kilburn Times Clause 1, 2, 12/12/2011; Mr Will Knock v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/12/2011. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:36 am
The strikes took place amid continuing skirmishes between members of Ansar al Sharia and Shiite rebels, which also killed approximately 10 people. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 3:52 am
CFPB and Trump v. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 7:46 am
People move a lot of money around during an Illinois divorce. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 11:23 pm
Knight First Amendment Inst. at Columbia Univ. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 11:23 pm
Knight First Amendment Inst. at Columbia Univ. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 1:32 pm
The loss of that thing will potentially make people less happy. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
For obvious safety reasons, most people set up their target ranges away from the house and do not use the curtilage as a shooting range. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:56 am
“Furthermore, if the Senate or House fails to pass a budget in that time, members of Congress will not be paid by the American people for failing to do their job. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 5:33 am
This point was considered in the case of Howlett v Holding ([2006] EWHC 41 (QB)). [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 1:33 pm
Military detention may be legitimate for those captured on an actual battlefield, as our supreme court recognised in Hamdi v Rumsfeld. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 11:39 am
Several people in the house during the search. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 11:50 pm
The Nearly Legal blog, penned by housing law experts, has posted a deconstruction of the articles, which it says amount to “a con-fused botch of the current law, which is both inaccurate and has serious omissions“. [read post]
