Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 3,635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2012, 9:30 am
The spouse must file a caveat or lawsuit in Superior Court. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:13 am
Cooper, in his November 29, 2013 opinion in Travis v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 12:25 pm
And clearly not brought up on this Superior Court of Justice decision at this point but we may see it in the future. [read post]
22 May 2018, 5:09 am
From last week's decision of the North Dakota Supreme Court in Bjerk v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:52 am
The Court of Appeal noted that Estrada v. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
Speakers who claim first-hand knowledge of some incident are essentially claiming to have superior expertise about the incident: They were present, and (usually) very few other people were. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 8:37 pm
Crane Co., et al., No. 10C-08-216, Delaware Superior Court, New Castle Cty., at p. 152 (June 11, 2012). [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 5:00 pm
In Ashton Trust v Caraway, an Arkansas court considered an 86- year-old womans’s penmanship in in determining that she knew what she was doing in selling land, even though her son contended that she had Alzheimer’s. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 8:19 am
” State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 1:02 pm
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 6:30 am
In 1981, in Rostker v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:58 am
Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
The recent Supreme Court decision in Yukon Francophone School Board, Education Area #23 v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 11:52 am
Some people believe that it is faster and less expensive than a trial in court. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:23 pm
Finally, there's no easy way to search California superior court rulings, so the inclusion of a couple such cases is purely fortuitous. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 5:15 pm
x Consumer Law and Policy Blog reports: In a closely watched case, the California Supreme Court on Thursday issued a decision preserving the broad availability of the state’s principal consumer protection laws in cases involving mislabeled goods.The question at issue in Kwikset v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm
Superior Court Judge Joel Wohlfeil said there is no evidence Elliott intended to deceive voters when her ad quoted an outdated court ruling that contained harsh criticisms of Briggs that appellate judges later softened. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 6:34 am
, Seaford Court Estates Ltd v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 2:57 pm
The D.C. case, Horn v. [read post]
