Search for: "Power v. Holder"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 2,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2009, 11:17 am
Princo v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 10:32 pm
Foster v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 11:31 pm
The general principle that is applied in disputes as to whether a resolution should be allowed to proceed to a meeting of members is, if the matter is within the power of members to decide, let them decide. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Obama Administration asked for ‘balance’ in intellectual property appointments (Public Knowledge) (Ars Technica) (Media Wonk) (EFF) (Law360) (Intellectual Property Watch) Senate Judiciary Committee passes Patent Reform Act of 2009 to Senate floor (Promote the Progress) (IP Watchdog) (Inventive Step) (Patent Baristas) (Patent… [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 8:39 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: French Parliament passes 3-strikes HADOPI law (Ars Technica) (Media Wonk) (TorrentFreak) (IPKat) (Out-Law) (Intellectual Property Watch) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) USTR releases ACTA summary (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) (Out-Law) (Intellectual Property Watch) Court of Appeals for the… [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 11:11 am
However, the case of Washington Post v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
(Editor’s Note: This post is based on a client memorandum by Jonathan C. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
LLC v W. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:53 pm
Arrangements have been made, GPLv2 has (we are assured) been respected, the legal rights and responsibilities of the various parties have been upheld.A lot of web commentators really wanted this to be a Good v Evil showdown, with the sizeable backlog of uncertainties around Linux, Microsoft and patents settled in public. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 12:38 pm
And writes a short but powerful concurrence to make his feelings on this issue known. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 8:32 am
In response to an ACLU lawsuit (Doe v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 12:22 pm
For example, do plaintiffs in patent holdup claims under Section 2 have the burden of demonstrating that the patent holder did not have monopoly power prior to the deceptive conduct? [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 3:52 pm
The renewable energy approvals regime would be set out in a proposed Part V.0.1 to the EPA. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 10:32 pm
Supreme Court called Dewsnup v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:50 am
Marilyn Barrett, California Tax Attorney at Jeffer Mangels, Discusses Select Tax Provisions of President Obama's Economic Stimulus Package Effective February 17, 2009, President Barack Obama signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (otherwise known as the "Stimulus Bill"), $787 billion economic stimulus legislation which President Obama said marks a "major milestone on our road to recovery. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 3:31 am
The motion in Parhat v. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 10:36 am
A deferential approach in this context is consistent with the commonsense understanding that “[t]he war power of the national government ‘is the power to wage war successfully,’” Lichter v. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 6:55 am
(C.M.) v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 1:18 pm
Indeed, Justice O'Connor's most quoted line in her 2004 plurality opinion in Hamdi v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 12:45 pm
" carry awesome power. [read post]
