Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 55,693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2011, 7:56 am
The Supreme Court today issued its long-awaited decision in an important climate change case, American Electric Power v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:19 pm
Ass’n v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:19 pm
Ass’n v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 11:00 am
Bush v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
In Biden v. [read post]
20 May 2007, 5:05 pm
Douglas Kmiec has a guest post on Balkinization responding to Marty Lederman on the Comey testimony, the late night hospital visit, executive power, and all that. [read post]
28 May 2024, 5:59 am
In Trump v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:26 am
She suspects the policy could be challenged on the same grounds as the West Virginia v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 5:00 pm
Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997) and United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:11 am
Sabri v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:48 am
From the New York Times:The Supreme Court on Monday allowed an enormous antitrust class action against Apple to move forward, saying consumers should be allowed to try to prove that the technology giant had used monopoly power to raise the prices of iPhone apps.The lawsuit is in its early stages, and it must overcome other legal hurdles. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 1:20 pm
Allen v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 11:40 am
Coleman v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am
In Norris v Milton Keynes Council [2010] EWCA Civ 77 (not on Baili, Lawtel or Westlaw yet, but, thanks to the Chief's special powers, we have a copy), Rimer LJ considered that a second appeal was merited on two points - LAG, which brought this case to our attention, notes that the appeal was compromised following the grant of permission. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am
In Norris v Milton Keynes Council [2010] EWCA Civ 77 (not on Baili, Lawtel or Westlaw yet, but, thanks to the Chief's special powers, we have a copy), Rimer LJ considered that a second appeal was merited on two points - LAG, which brought this case to our attention, notes that the appeal was compromised following the grant of permission. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:15 pm
If post-ratification history is relevant to constitutional meaning, the “Decision of 1789” presents more challenge than support for the unitary theory, with implications for Seila Law v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:15 pm
If post-ratification history is relevant to constitutional meaning, the “Decision of 1789” presents more challenge than support for the unitary theory, with implications for Seila Law v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 10:00 pm
In a recent New Jersey case, Marsico v. [read post]
