Search for: "Robert v. State" Results 2681 - 2700 of 19,114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2016, 2:49 am by Amy Howe
United States as a case that is “likely to be the Term’s most important federal sentencing case, and its second-most important immigration case after United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 12:30 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Roberts Facebook Posts Complaining About Supervisor Conduct do Not Support Retaliation Claim – DeBord v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 3:31 pm by Harry Styron
The purpose of such statutes is to “guard against testamentary thoughtlessness,” according to the opinion of the Arkansas Court of Appeals in  Robert Dotson v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:47 am by Charles Fried
 The analogy of states to hapless consumers as in some stretchy unconscionability cases (e.g., Williams v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:19 am by Marissa Miller
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:01 pm
This article in ABA Journal seems to give the impression that the Roberts Court is not particularly interested in constitutional facial challenges to state laws, instead favoring as-applied challenges. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 8:30 pm by Lawrence Solum
First, the Supreme Court’s categorical unwillingness to consider state-law reversals is nothing more than a self-imposed constraint from its 1874 decision in Murdock v. [read post]