Search for: "Roberts v. U.s"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 10,690
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Appellate panel urged to reject CFTC’s mandamus petition, while CFTC Commissioners seek to intervene
9 Oct 2019, 7:09 am
If the CFTC’s writ of mandamus was issued, a contempt hearing in the district court requiring the attendance and sworn testimony of three commissioners would be barred, and the case might be reassigned from Judge Robert Blakey to a different district court judge (CFTC v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:05 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
Robert D. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:54 pm
Patricia Millett of the U.S. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 11:14 am
When Chief Justice John Roberts asked her to comment on a statement by now-retired Judge Richard Posner of the U.S. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
Robert D. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 7:34 am
Kansas, with the support of the U.S. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:15 am
Justices Breyer, Kavanaugh, Ginsburg and Gorsuch and Chief Justice Roberts were among the most active questioners of Malcolm Stewart, representing the government of the United States, and Morgan Chu of Irell & Manella, representing NantKwest, during yesterday’s oral argument in Peter v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am
Cornell’s preview of Harris comes from Julia Canzoneri and Robert Reese Oñate. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Clayton CountyIn 2018, a panel of thirteen judges on the U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:17 pm
by Dennis Crouch Peter v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 2:07 pm
In Peter v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:58 pm
In Trump v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am
Kennedy’s swing vote resulted in a few liberal outcomes (notably on same-sex marriage), but Roberts defected from the conservative position only when it came to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which he famously voted to uphold in NFIB v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:41 am
Louisiana, in which the Court will decide whether the U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:02 am
” The justices also agreed on Friday to review U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 3:22 pm
” In Nixon v. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 1:01 pm
If the schedule has been punishing, one boon has come from the Office of the U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in the current Section 1981 case Comcast v. [read post]
