Search for: "Scalia v. United States" Results 2681 - 2700 of 4,639
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2019, 8:14 am by Brianne Gorod
United States, the Supreme Court held that Congress may shield the heads of regulatory agencies from removal at will, and the court has reaffirmed that decision many times since then. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 1:10 pm by Amy Howe
  At the end of the oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:20 am by John Steele
Abstract: On July 1, 2012, Jan Crawford of CBS News reported details of the confidential deliberations of the Supreme Court of the United States in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:13 am by Adam Chandler
United States, a Tenth Amendment case, drew notice from David Kopel at the Volokh Conspiracy, CBS News, the Christian Science Monitor, and Crime & Consequences. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
   Yet lower courts have read into the language an intent to exempt foreign securities even if the trade occurs in the United States. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 3:04 pm
" The Court said a presumption of administrative preclusion is also supported by United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 10:31 am by Erin Miller
United States and McDonald v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 8:25 pm by Kirk Jenkins
On Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court handed down its opinion in another of this term’s major class action cases. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:36 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Amgen then filed a petition to the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:07 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court considers whether to enforce the Second Amendment right to "bear arms" in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am by Mark Walsh
United States, one of the court’s many immigration cases this term. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:30 am by Kiran Bhat
The editorial board of the New York Times discusses the Montana campaign finance case as an example of “how the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision has upended important state campaign spending laws. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
” In American Greatness, Mark Pulliam asserts that Trump’s future Supreme Court appointments are essential to his success as a “disrupter,” arguing that for “Trump to succeed in his mission to ‘drain the swamp,’ he has to bat 1.000 with his SCOTUS appointments—the equivalent of picking Scalia, Thomas, and Alito seriatim,” because only justices in that mold will “resurrect the long-neglected limits on federal government power… [read post]