Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2010, 9:05 am
A federal judge’s forceful opinion Wednesday in favor of same-sex marriage is only the beginning of a process that is likely to go all the way to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 10:44 am
This post was authored by Paul Knothe and Kaylee Feick On May 30, 2017, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
See United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 1:34 pm
The only exception in the United States Constitution is the Thirteenth Amendment.The California Supreme Court, however, held many years ago that the California Constitution's guarantee of free speech also applies to some privately owned premises open to the public, such as shopping malls, and the U.S. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:58 am
In AT&T v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:45 am
Perry (challenging California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 12:00 am
Cal Aug. 15, 2017), the United States District Court for the Central District of California denied Wedbush Securities, Inc., Edward Wedbush, Gary Wedbush, Wedbush Securities In. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:34 am
District Court for the Southern District of California offered a well-reasoned reality check in Carpenter v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 1:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 6:20 am
Carnival Corporation et al., Case No. 2:12 CV 05517, filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 12:17 pm
Daire v. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 3:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 2:32 pm
’” She noted that the United States Supreme Court held in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 11:26 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 4:50 pm
Sprint Corporation, a Sprint Communications Company, L.P., et al., No. 2:14-cv- 02461-TLN-AC, pending before the Honorable Troy Nunley in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California (the “Action”) Quintilone & Associates and a team of lawyer successfully reached a settlement of claims that Sprint violated various provisions of California’s wage and hour laws by, among other things, allegedly failing to: provide… [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 12:56 pm
The treaty had been used by the United States in its lawsuit against Iran for taking Americans hostages in 1979. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 2:20 pm
American Catalog Mailers Association v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 4:26 pm
My personal view is that (1) Article III standing should exist, but (2) under United States Supreme Court precedent, it probably doesn't. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:11 am
” SCIL’s complaint in Southern California Institute of Law v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 2:15 pm
” (…) Glaser Weil’s argument focused on MDQ, LLC v. [read post]
