Search for: "State v. Bodi"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 14,865
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 12:26 pm
Whether you're convicted of murder, and thus spend most or all of the rest of your life in prison, should not depend on which particular appellate panel you happen to draw.The question presented is the required mental state for a murder conviction when you commit an assault. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:27 am
A previous case on the EIRs (Port of London Authority v Information Commissioner [EA/2006/0083]) had raised the possibility that bodies might be hybrid under the EIRs, i.e. public authorities for some purposes, and not for others. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 8:08 am
Bartlett v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 11:58 am
Jul 14, 2008):The Supreme Court has stated that "[i]n general, a false statement is material if it has 'a natural tendency to influence, or [is] capable of influencing, the decision of the decisionmaking body to which it was addressed.' " Neder v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 1:04 am
Jul 14, 2008): The Supreme Court has stated that "[i]n general, a false statement is material if it has 'a natural tendency to influence, or [is] capable of influencing, the decision of the decisionmaking body to which it was addressed.' " Neder v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2007, 3:36 am
Therefore, a forgotten but large body of cases from the Jim Crow-era holds Yick Wo categorically inapplicable to prosecutions for conduct the state has the power to criminalize. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 7:22 am
Bernard Port, Harbor & Terminal District v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 7:22 am
Bernard Port, Harbor & Terminal District v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 7:22 am
Bernard Port, Harbor & Terminal District v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:13 pm
The Court’s reasoning Silber J considered the case of R (Animal Defenders International) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport [2008] UKHL 15 and concluded that even though that case is awaiting a ruling from the Grand Chamber in Strasbourg, he was bound by the House of Lords’ ruling that the prohibitions on political advertising contained in sections 319 and 321 of the 2003 Act were justified as being necessary in a democratic society and… [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 11:50 am
And these posts may be of interest to you… Joe Biden v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm
In Florence v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court’s landmark case Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
Further, it castigated the RCMP, stating, “There is also a disquieting fact that, on the record before us, it seems that the authorities were much quicker to intervene to protect Mr. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 3:30 am
The Cowboy Suit Tragedy centers on the New York case McCormack v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 4:42 am
s PR consultant had, incorrectly, stated that P2 did not know P1 this was an unauthorised statement which had been corrected within 3 days [19]. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:25 pm
In both cases the virus--the infection of the body, or the body politic, must be confronted and its damage mitigated. [read post]
