Search for: "State v. Cash "
Results 2681 - 2700
of 5,705
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2014, 3:21 pm
Free food regular rate miscalculation cases have actually been around in California since the Seventies (e.g., Marshall v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Pearson v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Pearson v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 12:53 pm
According to the employee, his supervisor told him to “pad” his expense reports to get cash to pay for the strip club outings. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 8:09 am
The style of the case is, Avila v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:33 am
The Commissioners afterwards stated that the goods had been detained under the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979, s 139. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 6:52 am
In Saucier v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:46 am
See United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:46 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:47 pm
October 2012 (MC)), investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, sued for defamation (For example, see Applause Store Productions Ltd v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781; Cairns v Modi [2012] EWHC 756 (QB); [2012] EWCA Civ 1382; Tilbrook v Parr [2012] EWHC 1946 (QB). [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:03 am
” Similarly, they could choose to accept cash from a customer as payment for private dances, but if the customer offered special “dance dollars,” (of which the club took a cut) instead of cash (which the club did not touch), the dancer was not allowed to refuse. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 5:23 am
As learned Arnold J stated in SAS v WPL [para 27]:"In the light of a number of recent judgments of the CJEU, it may be arguable that it is not a fatal objection to a claim that copyright subsists in a particular work that the work is not one of the kinds of work listed in section 1(1)(a) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents 1988 and defined elsewhere in that Act. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 5:13 pm
The first challenge to a photo ID law to reach the Supreme Court—Crawford v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 8:11 am
This provision states that the amount of the discount is not the correct standard for valuing non-cash remuneration; rather, the proper measure is the “reasonable cost to the employer. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 2:04 pm
See Nonn v State of Texas. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:46 am
At the Brookings Institution, visiting fellow Charles Lister explains how Western governments can cut off ISIS’s cash flow. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 12:25 pm
Back in 1993, when I clerked for Justice Ginsburg, the Court decided the case of Ratzlaf v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 4:17 pm
" Further, particularly relevant to this case, the statute clearly states that the use of another's credit, not merely the receipt of tangible goods, is punishable under the statute. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 3:27 am
” (Compare the Delaware Chancery Court’s recent decision in Zutrau v Jansing, also a dissenting shareholder proceeding that came amidst a pending derivative action alleging corporate waste, in which, rather than awarding a percentage of excessive compensation as damages, the court directed normalizing adjustments to the appraiser’s discounted cash flow analysis.) [read post]
