Search for: "State v. Cooper" Results 2681 - 2700 of 7,766
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2016, 10:31 am by Harold O'Grady
Connecticut); that states are bound by the decisions of the Supreme Court and cannot ignore them (Cooper v. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 11:52 am
These private actors include primarily corporations,[20] nongovernmental organizations (NGOs),[21] and public-private hybrid actors.[22] But also included are public actors, most effectively within the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development,[23] and the apparatus of the U.N. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 11:15 am
Daily News, No. 08-2111 In an action for libel and intentional infliction of emotional distress based on news reports stating that plaintiff, a criminal defendant, was to cooperate with prosecutors, dismissal of the complaint is affirmed where the statement reporting that plaintiff planned to cooperate with authorities was not defamatory as a matter of law. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:05 am
 That change is visible within the apex organs of the contemporary state system ((Text of A/ES-11/L.1; UN General Assembly Resolution -- "Aggression against Ukraine"; UKRAINE v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am by Reference Staff
The legal opinion would become popularly known as The Boldt Decision.The actual title of the case is United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The state of libel litigation in England and Wales in 2011 can be summarised like this: no jury trials, not much media involvement and similar numbers of cases to 2010. [read post]