Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 2681 - 2700 of 4,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2009, 6:00 pm
Doe, supra, the Court of Appeals explained: Accordingly, though the question is novel in this State, it has been held, in circumstances such as here, that where by no fault on the parent's part, a child "voluntarily abandons the parent's home for the purpose of seeking its fortune in the world or to avoid parental discipline and restraint [the child] forfeits the claim to support" . . . [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 10:24 pm by Florian Mueller
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, famous for (among other high-profile cases) FTC v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:46 pm by Ilya Somin
Earlier today, the Supreme Court decided to hear Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:59 am
The New York Court of Appeals has applied the same principle to the due process guarantee in the state constitution. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:59 pm by Josh Blackman
Indeed, the firm filed at least two other election cases against the Secretary of State in that division (Gilby v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 7:12 pm
On appeal, the Appellate Division held that the ordering of a $500 sanction for each future violation was "premature". [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 5:59 am by Susan Brenner
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit 2010). [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
 In that case, Merck's 70mg once-weekly dosage regime patent for alendornate was revoked by the UK High Court (upheld on appeal) and the EPO in proceedings brought by Arrow. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
   The court of appeals found the district court’s ruling accurate “while incorrect in its specific formulation. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:29 am
The Court of Appeals overturned the Appellate Division’s holding, reinstating PERB’s determination. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:14 pm by familoo
Sadly I was right, because the transcript of RS v SS has now been updated to reflect that it has indeed not run at all smoothly. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 11:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Here's the heart of the analysis, which I think is generally quite right; the key precedents that the court discusses are Employment Division v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Many years ago, I got into a strange sort of contretemps with Judge Harry Edwards of the Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]