Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 2681 - 2700 of 9,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2012, 3:44 am by Russ Bensing
In the courts of appeals… In State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm by cdw
State, 2 So. 3d 137 (Fla. 2009), mandating a cut-off IQ score of 70 or below to meet the first prong of the test for mental retardation in capital sentencing, is contrary to Atkins v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm
  Petitioners also filed this case in federal district court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 4:03 am
Public policy precludes the arbitrating of court’s directing the removal of assigned personnel in alleged violation of the terms of a CBAMatter of County of Broome v New York State Law Enforcement Officers Union, Dist. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
While federal law incorporates state law on service of process when the defendant is to be served in a judicial district of the United States, it does not incorporate state law when the defendant is to be served abroad. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:51 am by Peter J. Dugan
On January 11, 2012, the United States Supreme Court for the first time recognized the so-called “ministerial exception” to workplace discrimination laws. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 2:36 pm by Irina Manta
Circuit ruled against her when it upheld the district court's decision below that had denied her citizenship claim. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 12:29 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
The Court denied the application for injunctive relief in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
Neither did the trial court take judicial notice of that reliability. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 6:41 am
The first of these restrictions was the court's upholding of the defendent's plea of res judicata and failure to state a claim. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:10 am
District Court for the Western District of Washingtonissued recently:  Watkins v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:55 am by Jason Rantanen
His vague charge appears to reflect the general uncertainty in this area, not only of the Texas district court, but of the entire judicial system. [read post]