Search for: "State v. Force" Results 2681 - 2700 of 32,527
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2023, 10:11 am by Eugene Volokh
Of course, a state legislature may dictate the terms in which the duress defense may be raised. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Newly independent states cannot shift their geography and will be forced to continue to engage with one another—tempering the approach to leaving or providing case-specific tools for negotiating the break-up. [read post]
The summer of our discontents Two months ago, if you prompted Version 3 of the AI-art generator MidJourney to generate depictions of an “otter on a plane using wifi,” you were rewarded with the nonsense in the left panel of our lead graphic. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 4:29 am by jonathanturley
The Court expressly stated that it was not ruling on this question in its 2020 decision in Bostock v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 11:45 am by Orin S. Kerr
  So my reworked materials start with a section on the history and the development of the Fourth Amendment, starting with Entick v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 6:33 am by Verena von Bomhard (BomhardIP)
As to preliminary references, there were three rulings in 2022 concerning trademarks and one on designs (C-421/20, Acacia v BMW). [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:18 pm by Ilya Somin
If New York State officials deem an urban area to be "blighted," blocks can be bulldozed and people and businesses can be forced to relocate. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
  JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
  To comply with payment of prevailing wages, the taxpayer must first look to the prevailing wage determination covering the time period of the project for the specific region of the state where the project is located. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 6:20 am by Richard Hunt
Sanchez and Gastelum v Pinnacle Hotel encourage serial litigation because they eliminate any possibility of a reasonably inexpensive dismissal, forcing the defendant to choose between a cheap settlement and an expensive victory. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 5:05 am by Michael C. Dorf
Meanwhile, although it opposed what it likely saw as officious intermeddling by the state plaintiffs in Arizona v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 9:42 pm by Ilya Somin
Ct. at 1012, "especially weighing the factor[] of time elapsed since the inception of the suit," Smoke v. [read post]