Search for: "State v. Items of Property" Results 2681 - 2700 of 2,924
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2008, 10:40 am
" The Innocence Project of Florida (IPF) is a 501(c)(3) organization dedicated to finding and freeing innocent people in Florida prisons. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Statement of Facts: State of Florida v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:50 pm by John Floyd
  150,000 Users Visited Child Porn Site   In an October 27, 2017 decision, United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 4:58 am by Steven P. Farmer and Mark Booth
  A new ground for licencing has also been added so that member states may enable the sale by listed persons/entities of proprietary rights in EU companies, provided the proceeds of such sale and transfer remain frozen. [read post]
4 May 2007, 5:50 pm by Denese Dominguez
This provision further adds to such expenses the enumerated items set forth in Section 707(b)(2)(A)(ii)(II, III, IV and V), (iii) and (iv). [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:19 am
European and Community trade mark watchers will probably know that an appeal to the Court of Justice has been lodged in Case C-327/11 United States Polo Association v OHIM. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:44 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
The payment of the appeal fee was effected with the date of 17 March 2015.V. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:40 am by Josh H. Escovedo and Zack Thompson
Supreme Court issued numerous landmark decisions in 2020, among those—for trademark scholars and practitioners—Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
Extension of Emergency State Staffing Flexibility State unemployment offices have temporary, emergency authority to use nonmerit staff through March 14, 2021. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:13 am
  The same happened in the aftermath of the Puffin/Penguin case [United Biscuits v Asda, noted here]. [read post]
These conversations don’t involve gifts of toys and other items of personal property, since these items are typically excluded as “exempt” resources and have no impact on public benefits. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:45 am by Jessica Kroeze
The following evidence inter alia was cited in opposition proceedings:D1: WO 02/15713D2: EP 0949329D3: DE 10163964D6: WO 02/051873D9: WO 95/21240D10: WO 97/29179D15: WO 96/22366D17: WO 00/70064D18: Kunze, "Technology Brewing and Malting", VLB Berlin, 1996, p. 83-87.The following evidence was filed with the appellant's statement setting out the grounds of appeal:D19: Excerpt from Südzucker Handbuch, "Erfrischungsgetränke", 2000D20: Leitsatz für… [read post]