Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 5,860
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2017, 2:37 pm
That case, Class v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:27 am
In 1971, in a case called Bivens v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:27 pm
” Riley v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm
” (To support the nationwide injunction, Washington argued that immigration law had to be uniform; ironically, the state had opposed this exact argument in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 1:14 pm
We know that because the four liberal Justices (Breyer, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan) dissented from the Court’s deferential decision in Kerry v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:40 am
Justice Sotomayor asked Mr. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 5:05 am
A partner at Hogan Lovells and Georgetown law professor, Katyal successfully challenged Bush administration War on Terror policies in Hamdan v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:38 pm
Two decades after writing the landmark United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:48 am
At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Coventry Health Care of Missouri v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:01 am
” At The Register, Thomas Claburn looks at Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:19 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 7:05 am
In NFIB v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the court’s recent decision to review National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 2:06 pm
Gershengorn argues before a six justice bench in Ziglar v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 11:32 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Lynch v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 11:03 am
Wednesday’s lone opinion, Lightfoot v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 7:56 am
United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 10:30 am
In Ashcroft v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:49 am
The oral argument yesterday morning in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 3:37 am
Locomotively questionable train analogies and a bench skeptical of the petitioner’s position marked Tuesday’s argument in Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
