Search for: "State v. Taylor " Results 2681 - 2700 of 3,341
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2010, 7:54 am
Agency’s initial decision sustaining an employee’s out-of-title work grievance overturned by the Governor’s Office Of Employee RelationsMatter of Cushing v Governor's Off. of Empl. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
It has given us unprecedented access to public affairs information—local, state, national, and international. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Tremblay, The Bouchard-Taylor Report on Cultural and Religious Accommodation: Multiculturalism by Any Other Name? [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:15 am by David Luban
Indeed, the colloquial "water torture" references in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:50 pm by cdw
  Adding to that, over the course of the last few weeks and for the next month, or so, I’ve been prepping and, starting next week, trying a fairly complex sexual assault case remanded for new trial by my state Supreme Court, State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:42 am
"As an example, a trustee of the State University pleaded guilty of attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree, a Class A misdemeanor. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:26 am
"In formulating his ruling, Justice Devine noted the decision by the Appellate Division in Civil Service Employees Ass'n v New York State Public Employee Relations Board, 46 AD3d 1037, but concluded that the decision was not a controlling precedent in this case. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:56 am by Beck, et al.
Taylor, 618 N.E.2d 518, 519-22 (Ill. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:29 am
A school board waiver of its right to dismiss a probationary school administrator at any time during the probationary term must be explicitly statedConsedine v Portville Cent. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 6:06 am
This, said the court, provided Carr with his rights to administrative due process.** §76.4 of the Civil Service Law provides, in pertinent part, §§75 and 76 of the Civil Service Law “may be supplemented, modified or replaced by agreements negotiated between the state and an employee organization pursuant to article fourteen [The Taylor Law] of this chapter. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 4:37 pm
”This element – seniority – cannot be diminished or impaired by the terms of collective bargaining agreement as demonstrated by City of Plattsburgh v Local 788, 108 AD2d 1045.In Plattsburgh the issue concerned the application of a Taylor Law contract provision dealing with seniority of employees in the classified service in a layoff situation.The collective bargaining agreement between Plattsburgh and the Union provided if there were to be demotions in connection… [read post]