Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Scales"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 2,798
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2008, 4:00 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 12:02 pm
During the search, the police discovered a machine gun, rolling papers, and a digital scale. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 11:51 am
” McKee v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 9:31 pm
. - I do gotta say that, as far as sympathy for murderer goes -- and, as you can imagine, that's not a very high scale -- this one strikes my somewhat sympathetic. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 5:11 am
The petition in Kelly v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 9:50 am
Yurman Studio, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 12:15 pm
The severance issue is still undecided.The most recent development in the case shows the consequences to people like Barnaba. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 11:32 am
In my view, a not insubstantial number of people is likely to have done so. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 10:00 am
Clancy v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 3:53 am
In Brinker v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 11:03 pm
New York Supreme Court: Smith v. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 3:29 pm
At any rate, let’s award all possible points due on the Attention-Grabbing scale. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 4:28 am
People v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 10:12 pm
A refinement was added in 1950 in Spires v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 5:45 pm
Alain Robert and Renaldo Clarke are not the first and probably not the last people to scale a large building or historical landmark in New York. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:20 pm
The distinction of lawyer v. non-lawyer is very artificial. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 11:10 am
Marshall v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
Several groups of critics trenchantly derided the SFSTs and their supporting empirical base and detailed other significant problems.3 In the past seven years, three large-scale field studies have been conducted that potentially address some of the problems noted earlier. [read post]
