Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 13,833
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2020, 9:48 am
The government made clear that the “United States unequivocally condemns child slavery and those who aid and abet it, and is committed to fostering respect for human rights. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am
District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
Resources Code, § 21166(a); CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15162(a), 15153(a); American Canyon Community United for Responsible Growth v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 4:30 am
United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am
United States, in which the court will decide next term “what constitutes criminal “computer misuse” under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
As the Court put it four years ago in Fisher v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
In South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
This case presents the following issue: Is the issuance of a well permit pursuant to state groundwater well-drilling standards a discretionary decision subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 11:20 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:31 am
(Golden Door Properties, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 6:33 am
The panel affirmed the lower district court’s judgment, “holding that budgetary transfers of funds for the construction of a wall on the southern border of the United States in California and New Mexico were not authorized under the Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 2019. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 12:52 pm
Thuraissigiam—a case about constitutional protections against expedited removal of immigrants unlawfully present in the United States—used xenophobic logic and endangers some immigrants, subjecting them to an administration’s whims. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:48 am
LOS ANGELES–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP (“GPM”) announces that it has filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada captioned Chowdhury v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 2:40 pm
In March 2020, in Salzberg v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
United States District Court for the Northern District of California Case No. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 6:12 am
United States (Endangered Species Act; Water Rights)Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 1:01 pm
United States (Endangered Species Act; Water Rights)Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 9:48 am
Buzz Photo v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 8:34 am
In Tennessee v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:58 am
Note, however, that while the FWW is permissible under federal law, some states, most notably California, do not allow it. [read post]
