Search for: "United States v. Cores" Results 2681 - 2700 of 4,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2007, 6:43 am
United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 122 F.3d 1409, 1415 (Fed. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 5:29 pm by Lawrence Solum
Board of Education, the United States Supreme Court’s exercise of judicial review did not support the notion that constitutional litigation could be an effective instrument of social reform. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 11:51 am
 The shift to considering IP as a business asset, the core of IP 3.0, may be an acknowledgement that true IP reform can best occur through better IP practice. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 11:21 pm
Certainly—and as I acknowledge in the book—there are places and times in which international human rights law itself has wavered since 9/11 including in the A v United Kingdom decision of the ECtHR—but by and large it has demonstrated more resilience than one might have expected. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:10 am by Fiona de Londras
Certainly—and as I acknowledge in the book—there are places and times in which international human rights law itself has wavered since 9/11 including in the A v United Kingdom decision of the ECtHR—but by and large it has demonstrated more resilience than one might have expected. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 6:36 am by Jack Goldsmith
  First, an important difference between a traditional armed conflict and the current one is that when the Germans were defeated, the POWs in the United States were thrilled to go home and posed no ongoing danger when released. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:01 am by Soren Dayton, Erica Newland
We explain these procedures below but first offer a brief explanation of how the war powers provisions of the NSRAA would regulate the United States’ engagement in hostilities abroad. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am by Jack Goldsmith
Netflix streams Rick and Morty and Star Trek: Discovery in the United Kingdom but not in the United States because its licensing contract requires such geographical differentiation to confirm with underlying copyright law.[11] For similar reasons, Amazon requires publishers of e-books to specify the countries where they own publishing rights, and it allows sales only to those countries.[12] Google likewise removes certain pages from its search results when ordered to do so… [read post]