Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 2681 - 2700 of 10,389
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Corp. v. 2319 Richmond Terrace Corp., 141 A.D.3d 626, 627, 34 N.Y.S.3d 616).Oral promise to pay credit card bills during the pendency of action unenforceable            In Novick v Novick, ‑‑‑ N.Y.S.3d ‑‑‑‑, 2019 WL 2202438 (Mem), 2019 N.Y. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:10 pm by Marina Chafa
The jury found Australian Leather and its owner Eddie Oygur willfully infringed the “UGG” mark when the Australian company sold 12 pairs of sheepskin boots brandishing the mark to customers in the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 12:52 pm
TrademarkUse of the Term/Mark “Engineer”State Regulation of the TermFirst Amendment’s Commercial SpeechDisclaimerAppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.E. raises only its constitutional claim on appeal. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:56 am by Steven Cohen
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al – United States District Court – Southern District of Mississippi – June 5th) involves a slip and fall. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 4:32 am
It tacked on counts for trademark infringement, unfair competition, and dilution, all of which claims were dismissed because the defendant does not currently use the VAGISAN mark in the United States. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court held 5-4 that pretrial imprisonment on a new criminal charge puts a term of federal supervised release on hold. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices will decide whether a provision of the federal sex-offender act violates the nondelegation doctrine, is “part of a campaign to use the courts in service of a libertarian rollback of the administrative state. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  The NFIB dissent marked a radical rightward shift in conservative jurisprudential ideology – embrace of libertarians’ rollback agenda. [read post]
29 May 2019, 5:54 am
OFAC made clear that the guidance was intended for U.S. companies as well as non-U.S. companies that conduct business in or with the United States, with U.S. persons, or using U.S. origin goods or services. [read post]
28 May 2019, 4:07 am by Blair Albom
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
24 May 2019, 12:24 pm by Nikki Siesel
Opposer argues that consumers in the United States refer to Rasiklal Manikchand Dhariwal as the Manikchand Group. [read post]
21 May 2019, 8:03 am by Bob Eisenbach
After almost thirty years of calm, a circuit split started in 2012 when the Seventh Circuit issued its decision in Sunbeam Products, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am by ASAD KHAN
Sarmiento and Sharpston view Zambrano (C-34/09, EU:C:2011:124), which caused a stir because of the substance of rights test, as a “high-water mark” in the CJEU’s jurisprudence. [read post]