Search for: "V D"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 76,326
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2008, 4:24 am
Posted by D. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 12:40 pm
Posted by D. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
Posted by D. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 10:55 pm
Pedley v Director of Public Prosecutions 2010 (QBD) (Meaning of ‘Children’s Playground’) D breached a Sexual Offences Prevention Order by observing young people playing in a skate park. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 2:19 am
Authority v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 2:18 am
Authority v. [read post]
18 Sep 2006, 9:17 am
AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 11:04 am
But the world seems to have overlooked the implications of Thomson v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 6:36 am
.' The appllication has now received a preliminary Section 2(d) refusal, citing reg 2844692 for ADVENTURES OF SNOOKY for a 'series of children's books.' Coverage here. [read post]
27 May 2010, 10:43 am
Supp. 906 (D. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 5:00 pm
As we predicted, the case was given a Rule 8.512(d) grant-and-hold review, and is now a companion case to Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 2:17 am
Tim Martin Interiors Ltd v Akin Gump LLP; [2011] EWCA Civ 1574; [2011] WLR (D) 39 “As regards quantification and repayment, a third party assessment under section 71 of the Solicitors Act 1974 was of limited use to a third party, since, after payment, it was not possible to require solicitors to pay to the third party money which they had received from their client and which the client was bound to pay them, merely because the third party was not… [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 4:57 am
A v B and another (Female parents: Role of biological father): [2012] EWCA Civ 285; [2012] WLR (D) 80 “Where a child was conceived by a mother and a father by virtue of an agreement between them that the child would live with and be brought up in the care of the mother and her female partner as the primary care givers of the child, there could be no general rule in family proceedings that the biological father was to be regarded only as a… [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:15 am
Società Consortile Fonografici (SCF) v Del Corso (Procuratore generale della Repubblica intervening) (Case C-135/10); [2012] WLR (D) 81 “‘Communication to the public’ for the purposes of article 8(2) of Directive 92/100/EEC did not cover the broadcasting, free of charge, of phonograms within private dental practices engaged in professional economic activity for the benefit of patients of those practices and enjoyed by them without any active choice on their… [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 4:34 am
Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences Inc [2011] UKSC 51; [2011] WLR (D) 312 “Since the Technical Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office had adopted a consistent approach to patents for biological material, the English courts should follow the principles of law set out in its decisions. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 2:15 am
Belmont Park Investments Pty v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd [2011] UKSC 38; [2011] WLR (D) 260 “The policy behind the anti-deprivation rule in insolvency law, that parties could not, on bankruptcy, deprive the bankrupt of property which would otherwise be available for creditors, was to be given a commonsense application which prevented its application to bona fide commercial transactions which did not have as their predominant purpose the… [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:25 am
Regina (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice (JUSTICE and another intervening); In re MacDermott’s and McCartney’s Applications for Judicial Review (JUSTICE intervening) [2011] UKSC 18; [2011] WLR (D) 155 “A miscarriage of justice, within the meaning of section 133 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, occurred where a new fact so undermined the evidence against the defendant that no conviction could possibly be based upon it. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 3:13 am
Lawrence and another v Fen Tigers Ltd (in liquidation) and others: [2012] EWCA Civ 26; [2012] WLR (D) 49 “If the character of a locality had been changed as a consequence of planning permission having been granted and implemented, then the question whether particular activities in that locality constituted a nuisance should be decided against the background of its changed character. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:30 pm
In Mendez v May, 2015 WL 143965 (D. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:46 pm
GoDaddy.com, Inc., 2:10-cv-00940-NVW (D. [read post]
