Search for: "Voter v. Voter" Results 2681 - 2700 of 6,763
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2017, 12:28 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 6, October 13, October 27 and November 3 conferences)   Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:28 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 6, October 13 and October 27 conferences)   Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 3:41 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for the Akron Beacon Journal, David Gans contends that “Ohio’s voter purge [at issue in Husted v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:38 am by Andrew Koppelman
  The new school of political economy that he created at the University of Virginia was “meant to train a new generation of thinkers to push back against Brown [v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:49 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 6 and October 13 conferences)    Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 3:17 am by Scott Bomboy
The question indirectly came before the Supreme Court in 1870 in a case called Virginia v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 5:22 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
This problem was on full display earlier this month, when the Supreme Court heard arguments in Gill v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports on the experience of an Ohio voter whose “occasional decisions not to vote had led election officials to strike his name from the voting rolls,” noting that in Husted v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:12 am by SHG
Trela, Jr., Ruth Greenwood, and Annabelle Harless, Brief of Amici Curiae League of Women Voters, et al., Hooker v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 11:23 am by Kelly B. Cullen
Rucho, a consolidated partisan gerrymandering case brought by Common Cause, the League of Women Voters of North Carolina, [organization pages] among others. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 9:55 am by David Post
Gill, as most of you are probably aware, involves a challenge to the Republican-dominated Wisconsin legislature’s 2011 redistricting map, a map that, according to the three-judge panel below, was both intended to, and did, systematically disadvantage Democratic voters and advantage Republican voters across the state. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 8:03 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The review found an error in a landmark ruling, Shelby County v. [read post]