Search for: "Washington v. Trump" Results 2681 - 2700 of 2,864
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2013, 1:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Licensing terms are trumping copyright’s default rules—sign away first sale and fair use rights. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:55 am by Raffaela Wakeman
John spoke on NPR’s Morning Edition today about the case, and Senator Ted Cruz penned a Washington Post op-ed expressing his view of the case, which is: the treaty power does not “trump” federalism. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am by Paul Rosenzweig
The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence was to have had a hearing today on proposed reforms to the NSA surveillance programs. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Yet Republicans are now shamelessly claiming that their ideological partisan politics trump their oath of office. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by Devlin Hartline
This is demonstrated by the fact that a fair user’s privilege trumps a copyright owner’s right. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The General Perjury Statute (18 USC 1621) has been nicely encapsulated in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 6:58 pm
” It might seem obvious that here in Oregon, in Washington or anywhere else in the country companies have an obligation to ensure that the products they sell are safe and function properly, but manufacturers of unsafe medical devices gained unprecedented liability protection via the Supreme Court’s 2008 Riegel v Medtronic case. [read post]