Search for: "Waters v. United States" Results 2681 - 2700 of 4,953
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 12 conference)   United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:55 pm by National Indian Law Library
(tax records, sovereign immunity)United Keetoowah Band of Cheeroke Indians in Oklahoma v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 8:44 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which a Yemeni national held at Guantanamo Bay had asked the court to decide whether military tribunals can try detainees for violations of U.S. law, and Conagra Brands v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ Nos. 21A244 and 21A247 _________________ NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, ET AL., APPLICANTS 21A244 v.DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, ET AL. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:16 am by Sean Minahan
United States, Dow Chemical sued the United States after the EPA took aerial photographs of Dow’s chemical plant in Midland, Michigan. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm by News Desk
The FDA recently sent warning letters to officials with a seafood processing plant in Brooklyn, NY, and a company in Puerto Rico that makes seasoning mixes for export to the United States. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:36 am
Safford United School District #1 v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:53 am by WIMS
This legislation (H.R. 872 in the 112th Congress and H.R. 935 in the 113th) would clarify Congressional intent regarding pesticide regulation in or near waters of the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:00 am by Stephanie Swing
  To establish coverage under the Act, a claimant must establish that the injury occurred upon the navigable waters of the United States, including any dry dock, or that the injury occurred on a landward area covered by Section 3(a), and that the work is maritime in nature and is not specifically excluded by the act. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:00 am by Stephanie Swing
To establish coverage under the Act, a claimant must establish that the injury occurred upon the navigable waters of the United States, including any dry dock, or that the injury occurred on a landward area covered by Section 3(a), and that the work is maritime in nature and is not specifically excluded by the act.  [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 6:23 am by Randy Barnhart
United States, 220 U.S. 523, 537, 31 S.Ct. 485, 488, 55 L.Ed. 570 (1911), quoting United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 4:30 am by Christina Reichert
 Koontz appealed to the United States Supreme Court, and the Court agreed to hear the case as a constitutional question. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 8:30 pm by A. Brian Albritton
Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit addressed whether the penalties assessed against a defendant under the False Claims Act ("FCA") can ever violate the 8th Amendment's protection against "excessive fines" in the appeal, United States ex rel Kurt Bunk & Daniel Heuser v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 10:23 am
 Moreover, the Court is considering enjoining the use of all aerial fire retardants, except water, in all fifty (50) United States. [read post]