Search for: "White v. United States" Results 2681 - 2700 of 6,614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2013, 1:19 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Most recently, in 2004, the Supreme Court echoed this point by concluding, in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 11:51 am by Danielle D'Onfro
Moreover, the city and its amici contend that the court has already determined that § 542(a) permits creditors to remain in possession of debtors’ property notwithstanding § 362 in the bankruptcy chestnut United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am by John Floyd
United States: Counsel must be at questioning after a suspect is charged. 1964 Escobedo v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:20 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-142. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 10:13 am
 In June 2010, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a District Court abused its discretion in issuing an injunction in a case involving GM alfalfa, Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 1:07 pm by Alex R. McQuade
Meanwhile, the United States is expected to send more troops to Iraq in the next coming weeks. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
   In other states where it applies, only specific local units are covered. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:41 am by The Charge
  He relied on "the principles laid down in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 10:58 am by John Floyd
”   End of Modern, Progressive State   President Trump has made it unmistakably clear that he wants to overrule Roe v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:35 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Richard Cordray was confirmed as the first Director of the CFPB by a 66-34 vote in the United States Senate on July 16, 2013, and took office on July 17, 2013.12. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:35 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Richard Cordray was confirmed as the first Director of the CFPB by a 66-34 vote in the United States Senate on July 16, 2013, and took office on July 17, 2013.12. [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:56 pm by Lawrence Solum
White, a Court majority ruled that a state could not prohibit candidates for judicial office from announcing their views on issues that might come before them. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:55 am
White, a Court majority ruled that a state could not prohibit candidates for judicial office from announcing their views on issues that might come before them. [read post]