Search for: "A,B,C Insurance Companies" Results 2701 - 2720 of 2,924
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2008, 6:31 pm
That points to methods (b) or (c), not (a). [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 9:36 am
"     Thus, in determining if the imputation doctrine applied, the Third Circuit needed to determine if Chait was (a) acting in the course and scope of his employment when he committed wrongdoing; (b) if the wrongdoing benefited the company; and (c) if it did not benefit the company, was Chait the only agent of Ambassador. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 1:26 am by David Rossmiller
  So to see that in writing was startling to me, and could only happen where a) a plaintiff's lawyer had no stake whatsoever in defending the conduct of his predecessor, b) his clients would benefit by distancing themselves from that conduct and c) the claims truly were unfounded and the lawyer would face ethical problems by saying otherwise (if "c" were not true, the lawyer would just be supplying ammunition against himself and other… [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 1:26 am
  So to see that in writing was startling to me, and could only happen where a) a plaintiff's lawyer had no stake whatsoever in defending the conduct of his predecessor, b) his clients would benefit by distancing themselves from that conduct and c) the claims truly were unfounded and the lawyer would face ethical problems by saying otherwise (if "c" were not true, the lawyer would just be supplying ammunition against himself and other… [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 1:00 pm
The model graduated drivers licensing program requires young novice drivers to proceed through three stages: (a) learner's permit, (b) intermediate or provisional license, and (c) a full license. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 1:24 pm
; (c) hospitals and other providers are almost encouraged to inflate "list prices" for services (to boost Medicare reimbursement, even though the actual charges to insurance companies are well below those levels); and (d) politicians obscure the real problems by blaming anyone seeking to shift the parameters ... the results are pretty obvious.Moving from employer-based to individual-linked "coverage," and away from such "insured"… [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Wheeler, No. 07-1816 Conviction and sentence for embezzling, stealing or otherwise converting employee contributions to a company's health insurance and 401(k) funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. sections 669 and 664, are affirmed over claims that the district court: 1) erred in defining the mens rea element of the offense under section 669; 2) admitted impermissible prior act evidence in violation of Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b); and 3) imposed an enhancement that… [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
: (Chinese Law Prof Blog), China – The intellectual property rights crisis: (Ezine @rticles)   Europe European Court of Justice to consider trade mark questions in Case C-342/08 Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel e.a. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
Aug. 29,2008)(Jefferson) (insurance coverage, duty to defend)ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AND NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 4:58 pm
Plaintiffs Grange Mutual Casualty Co., Grange Indemnity Insurance Co., and Trustgard Insurance Co. appeal the district court's Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of their civil action under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO") against defendant Joni L. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 5:01 pm
Grasso based on the March 2006 merger of the NYSE into a for-profit entity.(4) c. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Simpson, No. 07-5840 A sentence and order of restitution imposed for defendant's crime of mail fraud, involving his underreporting of payroll information for his businesses to his workers' compensation insurance carriers, is affirmed where the district court correctly concluded that the "loss" caused by this conduct was the amount of additional premiums that the insurance carriers would have charged had they been given accurate information. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 8:45 pm
Thus, it is unknown whether it would have tried to justify the volume payments under Section 8(c) of RESPA. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 10:04 am
Insurance Law § 2610(b) prohibits an insurer from recommending or suggesting a particular facility for repairs in the absence of an express request from the insured. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 2:28 pm
Royal American Company, LLC, March 17, 2008 (unpublished), the Court dismissed a tortious interference claim against a lender. [read post]