Search for: "Andrews v. State" Results 2701 - 2720 of 4,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2012, 6:57 am by Conor McEvily
The editorial board of The New York Times urges the Court to grant review in Shaygan v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 1:57 am
  This legal strategy by the pharmaceutical companies will be reviewed by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Wyeth v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 10:27 am by Brendan Kevenides
In 1995, the Illinois Appellate Court decided this issue in People v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Hoping to blame Pacific Gas & Electric power lines for Northern California fires, lawyers from coast to coast descend on wine country [Paul Payne, Santa Rosa Press-Democrat] Courts should police lawyers’ handling of class actions, including temptation to sweep additional members with doubtful claims into class so as to boost fees [Ilya Shapiro, Trevor Burrus, and Reilly Stephens on Cato certiorari amicus in case of Yang v. [read post]
Recently, the decisions of courts in the United Kingdom (UK) in Unwired Planet v Huawei Technologies (Unwired Planet) and Optis Cellular Technology v Apple (which followed the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Unwired Planet) have given rise to significant debate over the appropriate forum for litigation of disputes in relation to standard essential patents (SEPs). [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 16 May 2016 Sir David Eady heard a PTR in the case of Bloor v Beresford. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:23 am by Aaron Tang
Our first topic of the week is Florence v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
United States A federal appeals court agrees that producers of Wolf of Wall Street didn’t recklessly make false statements about Andrew Greene, a former executive at the real-life brokerage firm at the centre of the 2013 Martin Scorsese film, Stratton Oakmont. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 6:51 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
  New York State’s Empire State Development (the “NYSESD”) has issued guidance as to what industries and businesses constitute essential services who are exempt from the requirement that 100% of the workforce must stay home. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 3:00 pm by Hudson Hongo
” The state of Nevada, however, bizarrely argues that young people would be better off without this protection. [read post]