Search for: "BAKER v BAKER" Results 2701 - 2720 of 4,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2010, 11:30 am by Stefanie Levine
  The ‘943 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Baker Hughes Incorporated v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Proctor    Southern District of Ohio at Columbus 08a0398n.06  2008/07/01 Baker v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Proctor    Southern District of Ohio at Columbus 08a0398n.06  2008/07/01 Baker v. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 10:55 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Turning to functionality, Arnold provides a detailed account of the law from Navitaire v EasyJet, Nova v Mazooma and of course SAS v WPL. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney is liable in a malpractice action if the plaintiff can prove that the attorney failed to exercise the skill commonly exercised by an ordinary member of the legal community and that such negligence was the proximate cause of damages (see Rudolph v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corten & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442; Barnett v Schwartz, 47 AD3d 197, 203; Baker, Sanders, Barshay, Grossman, Fass, Muhlstock & Neuwirth, LLC v Comprehensive Mental Assessment… [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Colorado rule apparently requires private mall owners to allow speakers only if the private mall is somehow specially intertwined with the government, for instance if the government has substantially subsidized the mall (which is irrelevant under First Amendment law, see Rendell-Baker v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 10:53 am by Amy Howe
Wisconsin and Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:55 am by Walter James
Tubbs on a review of the various treatment units in place at the facility, including the API oil/water separator, the sludge pit and drying bed, the electro-coagulation unit, the reverse osmosis unit, the DAF (diffused air flotation) unit, the Baker filters and the injection of ammonia, CO2 and acid into the treatment system. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 1:28 pm
But, in a nifty piece of footwork, Baker v R [1975] AC 774 sets out that where an inferior court is confronted by two directly conflicting decisions of a higher court, the inferior court was entitled to chose the decision that appeared the most logical. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Justice Alito’s point was broadened by Justice Kavanaugh who at oral argument in the Mississippi case at issue, observed that, stare decisis notwithstanding, there is a Supreme Court history of overruling cases, [citing] Brown v Board (desegregating public schools) Baker v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:11 am by Dale Carpenter
Such a claim would trivialize free speech protection in the way that the Court in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
Root, Roger Parloff of Fortune, Katharine Baker at the IIT Chicago-Kent Faculty Blog, and the Committee for Justice at its blog. [read post]