Search for: "Billings v. United States" Results 2701 - 2720 of 10,147
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2008, 12:42 pm
As noted previously, a bill was introduced earlier this week that would do precisely that. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 6:55 am by John McKiggan
So why is Jian Ghomeshi facing criminal charges in Canada while Bill Cosby is unlikely to face charges anywhere in the United States? [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
 That is the case, now usually called United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 2:29 pm by Jodie Liu
First, it creates an emergency exception allowing the government to continue targeting “roamers”—people lawfully targeted as non-United States persons located outside the United States, but who suddenly show up in the United States—for a brief period of time after they show up in the United States, so long as “a lapse in the targeting of such non-United States person poses a threat… [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:59 am by Eugene Volokh
Naturally, some people might try to defend this on the grounds that prosecutors won’t apply the statute as broadly as it’s written, but will instead focus just on “extreme” cyberbullying; but I think Chief Justice Roberts’ majority opinion in last week’s United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 9:10 pm
 As the Complaint   states: "This action seeks a declaration that Arizona's recently enacted Senate Bill 1014 (hereinafter Bill) which prohibits the use of the name of any soldier, alive or deceased, on any item for sale without permission of the soldier or their legal representative, violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:38 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (4th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of Law Professors Amicus brief of New Jersey Public Advocate Amicus brief of the United States (grant) Supplemental brief of respondents No. 09-475, Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 9:23 am by kwalters
The United States was among the few nations to fail and dramatically regress. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 9:23 am
The United States was among the few nations to fail and dramatically regress. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:01 am by By Chase Strangio, Staff Attorney, ACLU
Then, like Edie Windsor who successfully challenged the constitutionality of the so-called Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 5:24 am
 Here are the official positions of each party:The Republicans aver that the Democrats, sensing weakness, refused to approve a reasonable spending bill until the Republicans and Trump agreed to 1) Let all Mexicans who have criminal records into the United States with fast access to becoming citizens. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 5:00 am by Beck/Herrmann
In the meantime, here's other Iqbal news: First, Russell Jackson reports on a proposed bill that would statutorily overrule Twombly and Iqbal and write the result of Conley v. [read post]